Three weeks and counting: Why the Express' complaints procedure leaves much to be desired

Regular Full Fact readers will know that on 23 January this year Full Fact factchecked the Daily Express' front-page claims on the FTSE 100.

The Express is not currently part of the Press Complaints Commission (PCC), so we were forced to ask for a correction directly from the newspaper itself. We contacted the Express to find out why their figures appeared to contradict the facts.

A week later; no response. So we contacted them again.

A week later; no response. So we contacted them again.

A week later; no response. So we contacted them again.

It has now been three weeks since our intial enquiry was sent but we have still failed to receive any response from the newspaper either clarifying what the figures mean or offering a correction.

Full Fact made clear in its evidence to the Leveson Inquiry that any regulatory system that succeeds the current framework must ensure that the highest standards of accuracy and the best available versions of the truth are effectively promoted. This includes, where corrections are necessary, ensuring the quickest response possible to minimise the potential harm caused.

This is by no means the most significant or serious example of apparent inaccuracy that Full Fact has encountered. It nevertheless serves to demonstrate the inadequacy of the current means by which the public can have their concerns heard. First, in that the Express seems to have no system for for dealing with corrections. Second, in that the Express is not covered by the PCC so nothing can be done about their inaction.

With Lord Justice Leveson's eyes on newspaper behaviour at the moment, we will keep waiting and contacting the Express until we hear back.

The waiting time is currently 21 days and counting.

 

Our letter to the Express is below:

I am writing to point out what I believe may have been an error on your front page dated 23rd January 2012.
 
In your article: 'Pension boost for millions' you cite:
 
"A three per cent rise in the value of Britain’s top companies so far this month – the biggest January increase in the FTSE 100 for 23 years – is worth thousands of pounds to workers in private pension plans."
 
And later:
 
"Last week’s rise – the best weekly performance since 1989 – could be the start of a rally which could help repair the damage done to retirement schemes during a year of turmoil in 2011."
 
However, after researching these points I found that this month's rise is only the biggest for 14 years and not 23. In addition, I found more recent stronger weekly performances - in the week beginning 24 November 2008 the index rose by 13.4 per cent which outperforms the recent weekly rise.
 
The research I did on the matter is here: http://fullfact.org/factchecks/FTSE_100_January_rises-3259 
 
Please let me know if you think there is anything inaccurate in the research as the journalist in question (I believe Ms O'Grady) will know the source of the data.
 
Otherwise, if you accept the points I would appreciate if you took the time to print corrections or clarifications in your print edition and amend the online article. Please feel free to get in touch directly if you would like to discuss the matter.
 

 
 

Comment is free but facts are expensive!

Full Fact believes in the possibility of accurate and informed debate. Our factchecks look at whether it is reasonable for interested citizens to trust the claims of politicians and journalists based upon the evidence that is available to us. Where we find mistakes, we ask for them to be corrected.

 

Corrections:

We aim for our factchecks to be as accurate and up-to-date as possible. If you think we have made an error or missed some relevant information, please email: corrections@fullfact.org