Are 93 per cent of "custody battles" won by mothers?

The Family Justice Review final report “flatly rejected claims by fathers' rights groups that the current system is biased – despite figures showing that 93 per cent of custody battles are won by the mother”.
Daily Mail, 4 November 2011
The recommendations of the Family Justice Review final report were yesterday denounced by the Daily Mail as a “betrayal of the family”.
Among other things, the review advised that “no legislation should be introduced that creates or risks creating the perception that there is a parental right to substantially shared or equal time for both parents”, advice that drew strong criticism from certain fathers' rights groups and sections of the press.
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) said it didn't recognise the 93 per cent figure, while the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (CAFCASS) confessed themselves “baffled” as to the source of the Daily Mail's statistics.
Eventually, our inquiries paid off. Fathers for Justice (whose reaction to the review was quoted also in the Daily Mail article), told us that, although they didn't have a figure for the results of court disputes between parents, they did have numbers that appear to be the source of the Daily Mail's claim.
They told us that this result came from the Child Support Agency (CSA). The CSA figure refers to the proportion of all separated or divorced couples with children, for which the children live with the mother.
Fathers for Justice told us that to their knowledge there was no record of the proportion of cases in which the courts awarded child custody to the mother.
If the CSA figures are indeed the source of the Daily Mail's claim, then it has clearly been misrepresented. Not all of these couples will not have gone through the court system, but instead will have reached an arrangement either on their own or with the help of mediation. Their results cannot therefore be used as evidence of outcomes custody battles, which is the context in which the Daily Mail uses the figure.
Conclusion
Full Fact has contacted the Daily Mail to ascertain whether the CSA report is indeed the source of their claim, as seems likely. If it is we will be asking for a correction.
Comment is free but facts are expensive!
Full Fact believes in the possibility of accurate and informed debate. Our factchecks look at whether it is reasonable for interested citizens to trust the claims of politicians and journalists based upon the evidence that is available to us. Where we find mistakes, we ask for them to be corrected.
Corrections:
We aim for our factchecks to be as accurate and up-to-date as possible. If you think we have made an error or missed some relevant information, please email: corrections@fullfact.org



