Is the UK really the most popular place in Europe for permanent migrants?

“More immigrants settle permanently in Britain than any other country in Europe, a study revealed yesterday.
The latest figures showed that 397,900 foreigners decided to live here in 2009 – second in the world only to the U.S.”
Daily Mail, 13th July 2011
Full Fact has looked into the way in which migration statistics are reported a number of times recently we have found problems with press reports - such as in The Guardian and The Times.
So when the Daily Mail reported today that Britain is the top destination in Europe for permanent migrants and second only in the world to the United States, we decided to take a look.
Analysis
The article in the Mail claims that 397,900 people settled permanently in the UK in 2009, up 14 per cent from 2008.As explained in the article, the figures are taken from a report by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
The report, 'International Migration Outlook 2011' sets out the statistics on international migration into and out of OECD countries. The Mail correctly reported that Britain- with 397,900 settlers- ranks second to the United States where permanent settlers top 1.1 million. The figure for Britain is indeed up 14 per cent from the previous year.
Whilst the UK is at the very top end for numbers of permanent settlers in 2009, the numbers have remained fairly stable since 2003, whilst other countries have experienced a substantial decline. As such, the OECD report shows that in 2008 the UK was fourth, seeing significantly less permanent settlers than the US, Italy and Spain.
It does suggest at the top of the article that Britain is first in Europe and second in the world, although it does clarify further down that the OECD only represents developed countries.
As explained in both the OECD report and the press coverage, the increase seen in the UK is due to people who had entered in previous years changing to permanent statement. The most significant part of this group was international students. The report states that it is this, rather than a surge in new arrivals that explains the figures.
The most recent set of statistics from the ONS covering Long Term International Migration show that "The provisional estimate of total long-term international immigration to the UK in the year to September 2010 was 586,000. This level has been broadly maintained since 2004."
Conclusion
All of the figures which the Mail reports from the OECD report check out against the figures - including the claim that most other OECD countries have experienced a decline in the number of permanent settlers.
Since Full Fact has on a number of occasions found inaccuracies and inconsistencies in the Mail's reporting and we hope we can look forward to more of this accurate reporting in the future.
Liked this? Read these:
- Is Britain Europe's 'migrant magnet'?
- Migration statistics: do the Express' claims hold up to scrutiny?
- The state of British education today: what does the OECD report say?
- Is the UK facing smaller cuts than other European countries?
- Has the Coalition issued more work visas in its first year than Labour did in its last?
Can't get enough of Full Fact? Sign up to our monthly newsletter
Comment is free but facts are expensive!
Full Fact believes in the possibility of accurate and informed debate. Our factchecks look at whether it is reasonable for people to trust the claims of politicians and journalists based upon the evidence that is available to us. Where we find mistakes, we ask for them to be corrected.
Feedback:
We aim for our factchecks to be as accurate and up-to-date as possible. If you think we have made an error or missed some relevant information, please email: feedback@fullfact.org
More on these topics:
- Is Britain Europe's 'migrant magnet'?
- Migration statistics: do the Express' claims hold up to scrutiny?
- The state of British education today: what does the OECD report say?
- Is the UK facing smaller cuts than other European countries?
- Has the Coalition issued more work visas in its first year than Labour did in its last?



