Full Fact appeared on BBC Radio 2's Jeremy Vine show today to talk about the numbers behind David Cameron's immigration speech. The Prime Minister wants EU migrants to wait four years to be able to claim some benefits, and warned that if his concerns "fall on deaf ears" then he will "rule nothing out" - alluding to a possible UK withdrawal from the EU.
Here are some of the facts behind the PM's speech we discussed, and a few more too.
"[People] want control over who has the right to receive benefits"
5.3 million people in the UK claim the main out of work benefits, 395,000 (7%) were non-UK nationals when they registered for an NI number (though some of these have an unknown nationality).
The drawback of these figures is they only count people's nationality at the point they registered for a National Insurance number (which could have been years ago). Their nationality could have changed in the meantime.
From the same figures, 12% of Jobseeker's Allowance (JSA) claimants, 6% of Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) and incapacity benefits claimants and 8% of Lone Parent benefit claimants are non-UK nationals (or have unknown nationality).
Similarly, 16% of families claiming tax credits contained a non-UK national, and 14% of Child Tax Credit claimants alone.
A compilation of the figures has been put together by the House of Commons Library.
"our National Health Service, which would grind to a halt without the hundreds of thousands who have come from overseas to help run it."
112,000 NHS workers are foreign, as of 2013. That's out of 1.2 million people who work in the NHS outside general practice (figures for GPs and GP practice staff aren't available by nationality). So just under 10% of NHS workers—minus those in general practice—are foreign nationals.
"Even at the end of the so-called boom years, there were around five-million people in our country of working age but on out-of-work benefits."
In the early 2000s, prior to the economic downturn in 2008, there were between 4.5 and 5 million people claiming a key out-of-work benefit: Jobseeker's Allowance, Employment and Support Allowance, Incapacity Benefit, Severe Disablement Allowance, Lone Parent and other income-related benefits.
"And this was at the same time as the last government enabled the largest wave of migration in our country's history ...
"Over the last ten years, immigration to the UK has soared, while the number of Britons going to work abroad has remained roughly the same."
Immigration hit historically high levels in the early 2000s. Although the figures haven't yet returned to their 2005 peaks, the levels remain similar under the Coalition.
Immigration into the UK grew from typically around 300,000 a year in the 1990s to almost 600,000 a year in the mid-noughties. Net migration - the difference between people coming to live in the UK and people moving abroad - peaked at over 300,000 in mid-2005.
As the Prime Minister says, the number of Britons moving abroad to work hasn't changed a great deal. Between 60,000 and 80,000 British people emigrate to work each year—compared to a range of 50,000 to 70,000 back in the 1990s.
"The gross figures are that 8.3 million people came to the UK as long-term migrants in the thirty years leading up to 2004. And a further 4 million came in the next seven years."
A wider point to consider is the impact on the size of the UK population. Net migration accounted for the majority of population change in the 2000s, the rest being a result of births minus deaths ('natural change'), although some of those births will have been to immigrant parents.
"whereas in the past the majority of the growth in employment was taken up by foreign nationals last year two thirds of that growth benefited British workers."
It's good to see the Prime Minister adjusting a previous, inaccurate claim about the proportion of 'new jobs' that go to foreign workers. As we've made clear, the figures from the ONS don't say anything about 'new' jobs, just the change in employment over a period. It can still be confusing to take proportions of a 'net' figure though, since if UK employment were to rise and non-UK employment fall, it would mean UK nationals account for 'over 100%' of the growth.
That said, the Prime Minister is drawing attention to a change in the rate at which UK and non-UK employment is growing. In 2006 and 2007 the number of UK nationals in employment actually fell for large periods while non-UK employment rose. In the last year, 64% of the increase in employment is accounted for by UK nationals.
"And let me be clear: the great majority of those who come here from Europe come to work, work hard and pay their taxes. They contribute to our country."
We reported on a recent study by University College London which tried to estimate the contribution of recent immigrants to the public finances, as well as immigrants resident in the UK since 1995 (who could have arrived much earlier in the 20th century).
Recent arrivals from the EU were estimated to have contributed £20 billion more to the public purse than they'd taken out in social security, although the positive contribution was much lower looking at immigrants resident in the UK over the longer period.
This and other similar studies are trying to put numbers on something extremely difficult to measure, and its worth bearing in mind that figures like these are based on a lot of assumptions, some of which have been questioned elsewhere.
The integrity of our elections is in danger, and we need your help
You’re probably here looking for facts. Thank you for that trust. But with the EU parliament elections on the way and more elections a possibility, we need to act now to make sure our elections are protected, before it’s too late.
Could you help protect our elections by becoming a Full Fact donor?
Misinformation isn’t new, but advancements in technology mean it can spread at an unprecedented scale. Our dangerously outdated election laws have not kept up with the digital age, putting our next elections at risk of abuse.
Currently, it’s possible for a candidate to run a thousand different political ads to win the same seat, promising something different to each group it targets. At the same time, there’s no law requiring those who publish online campaigns to disclose who they are or how they are funded. The opportunity for bad actors to manipulate election results is left wide open.
You may already know about our work to make public debate online more honest and transparent. Every day, we call out the most harmful misinformation on social media platforms when and where we see it. But right now, we’re urging the government to overhaul our election laws to make sure political campaigning is held to the same level of scrutiny online as it is offline.
This work all depends on the generosity of hundreds of people who all believe that for democracy to work, we need transparency. Our monthly donors help strengthen our voice, and show our politicians that this really matters. Would you consider joining them?
Become a donor today to make sure our elections are protected.