Type 1 diabetes is listed as a side effect on the MMR vaccine package insert.
Diabetes is listed as an adverse reaction on the MMR II vaccine used in the USA. This isn’t the same as a side effect – it can refer to conditions developed by chance after someone has been vaccinated but which aren’t caused by the vaccine. Neither of the two MMR vaccines used in the UK list diabetes in their information and evidence shows there is no link between the MMR vaccine and Type 1 diabetes.
A post claiming that type 1 diabetes is listed as a side effect of the MMR (measles, mumps and rubella virus) vaccine has been shared on Facebook over 2,000 times.
A brand of MMR vaccine used in the USA (not in the UK) lists diabetes as an ‘adverse reaction’ in its information leaflet for doctors (although not in the guidance for patients). But, perhaps confusingly, that doesn’t mean it’s a side effect caused by the vaccine.
What’s more, the evidence shows there is no link between MMR vaccines and diabetes.
Diabetes is listed as an ‘adverse reaction’ on the MMR vaccine used in the USA
In the USA, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) publishes a range of information about the MMR II vaccine, including the leaflets that come with it. Diabetes is not mentioned as a side effect in the information for patients, but is mentioned as an “adverse reaction” in the more complete leaflet for doctors.
The leaflet says: “The following adverse reactions are listed in decreasing order of severity, without regard to causality, within each body system category and have been reported during clinical trials, with use of the marketed vaccine, or with use of monovalent or bivalent vaccine containing measles, mumps, or rubella:… Diabetes mellitus.”
Diabetes mellitus is the Latin name for Diabetes, whether it’s type 1 or type 2.
We spoke to the FDA who told us that mentioning diabetes in the leaflet in this way doesn’t mean that the MMR II vaccine can cause diabetes. The list of adverse reactions includes things that have been reported during clinical trials or once the vaccine is being used by the public, but it doesn’t take into account what actually caused those reactions.
The Vaccine Knowledge Project at the University of Oxford explains in more detail on its website how a condition not caused by a vaccine could be listed among its adverse reactions. It says that adverse reactions “are not always exactly the same as ‘side effects’, because reporting an adverse event after vaccination does not prove a link with the vaccine.”
“When a vaccine is given to a very large number of people in a population, it is likely just by chance that a few of them will develop some kind of medical problem around the time of vaccination, but this does not prove ‘cause and effect’. This means that the reactions listed in the product information may not all be side effects of the vaccine itself.”
This brand of vaccine isn’t used in the UK
There’s no link between the MMR vaccine and diabetes
The Vaccine Knowledge Project told us the evidence supports the fact that there is no link between MMR vaccines and type 1 diabetes and said conflicting opinion on the issue is based on anecdote. It pointed us towards a large study undertaken by academics in Denmark and a review of the existing evidence by the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (the "leading journal and database for systematic reviews in health care"). Both show that there is no association between childhood MMR vaccinations and diabetes.
This article is part of our work factchecking potentially false pictures, videos and stories on Facebook. You can read more about this—and find out how to report Facebook content—here. For the purposes of that scheme, we’ve rated this claim as a false because there is no link between the MMR vaccine and diabetes (as implied by the post) and diabetes is listed as an ‘adverse reaction’ in the US, which is not the same as a side effect.
The integrity of our elections is in danger, and we need your help
You’re probably here looking for facts. Thank you for that trust. But with the EU parliament elections on the way and more elections a possibility, we need to act now to make sure our elections are protected, before it’s too late.
Could you help protect our elections by becoming a Full Fact donor?
Misinformation isn’t new, but advancements in technology mean it can spread at an unprecedented scale. Our dangerously outdated election laws have not kept up with the digital age, putting our next elections at risk of abuse.
Currently, it’s possible for a candidate to run a thousand different political ads to win the same seat, promising something different to each group it targets. At the same time, there’s no law requiring those who publish online campaigns to disclose who they are or how they are funded. The opportunity for bad actors to manipulate election results is left wide open.
You may already know about our work to make public debate online more honest and transparent. Every day, we call out the most harmful misinformation on social media platforms when and where we see it. But right now, we’re urging the government to overhaul our election laws to make sure political campaigning is held to the same level of scrutiny online as it is offline.
This work all depends on the generosity of hundreds of people who all believe that for democracy to work, we need transparency. Our monthly donors help strengthen our voice, and show our politicians that this really matters. Would you consider joining them?
Become a donor today to make sure our elections are protected.