"Latest estimates suggest that there's about 1,300 trillion cubic feet of shale gas lying underneath Britain at the moment — and that study only covers 11 counties. To put that in context, even if we extract just a tenth of that figure, that is still the equivalent of 51 years' gas supply." David Cameron, The Daily Telegraph, 12 August 2013
Today the Prime Minister stuck his neck out for shale gas.
Our estimated shale gas supply, he claims, could provide us with 51 years of gas supply.
The British Geological Survey findings
After the Government announced in December 2012 that it would be lifting its moratorium on fracking, the British Geological Survey (BGS) surveyed the area of the Bowland Basin and beyond, which covers 11 counties in the North of England.
Their findings are reported in a Department of Energy and Climate Change paper, which was published at the end of June. The BGS found that in the area between Wrexham and Blackpool in the west, and Nottingham and Scarborough in the east there should be roughly 1,300 trillion cubic feet (tcf) of shale gas. Or, more specifically:
"The lower limit of the range is 822 tcf and the upper limit is 2281 tcf, but the central estimate for the resource is 1329 tcf."
This chimes with the figure cited by the Prime Minister, however, crucially this "represents the gas that we think is present, but not the gas that might be possible to extract," which is known as the reserve estimate.
Resource vs. Reserve
The resource estimate is the total amount of gas estimated to be underground.
This is not the same as the amount of gas that might be possible to extract, which is known as the potentially (or technically) recoverable resource. A Parliamentary POSTbox on shale gas potential assumes that the UK would present similar recovery factors to those seen in the US, which ranged from 8-20%.
The reserve is a more speculative measure, usually a fraction of the potentially recoverable resources that are deemed to be commercially recoverable.
The proportion of gas that it may be possible to extract is, as the BGS points out, unknown. It's dependent upon a number of economic, geological and social factors that will prevail at each operation, such as how easy it is to access the site, what infrastructure is in place and whether or not the area is densely populated.
This is why Mr. Cameron felt obliged to point out that we may only be able to "extract just a tenth of that figure". And even that is speculation at this point.
51 years of gas supply?
How did Number 10 come up with these estimates? Commenting on the findings in the Guardian last month, Peter Styles, professor of applied and environmental geophysics at Keele University, said the UK's shale gas reserves could supply the country for 25 years:
"We still need to extract it and that is the next trick, but if we only get 10% that will be around 25 years of UK gas supply and by then we need to have worked out how we are going to power the UK in the long term."
This is half of the Prime Minister's estimates.
So which is it: 25 or 51 years?
We spoke to Prof Styles who told us that:
"Currently the country uses around 3 trillion cubic feet per year of natural gas reserves. Given that increased supply could lead to increased usage, I believe that the country could consume 4, maybe 5 trillion cubic feet of shale gas per year into the next decades. Based on this, I have estimated that this would translate into at least 25 years' gas supply although it may perhaps be much more."
Based on this, the Prime Minister estimates that if we extracted a tenth of the estimated 1,300 tcf of shale gas resources, that would translate into 51 years of gas supply. That is the equivalent of 2.5 tcf of annual usage.
Number 10 used the latest data on natural gas demand which shows that in 2012 net natural gas demand amounted to 72 billion cubic meters (2.3 tcf).
If we convert 10% of 1,300 trillion cubic feet (130 tcf) into billion cubic meters we get a supply of 3,682 bcm which should last precisely 51 years.
This is of course, assuming that our current consumption levels remain constant for the next 51 years. However this seems unlikely. Population growth, the changing price of oil and the changing costs in fracking technology are all factors which can be reasonably expected to influence these levels.
As previously mentioned, Prof. Styles interpreted things differently: an increased supply, he says, should lead to increased demand and therefore usage.
Currently government projections only go up to 2030, when natural gas demand is estimated to amount to 78.8 billion cubic meters, more than current levels. Though the difference isn't too stark, these projections are somewhat at odds with the Prime Minister's estimates.
The BGS on the other hand hasn't estimated how long our shale gas reserves might last. They have after all said that the UK's extractable reserves are still an unknown.
Flickr image courtesy of Daniel Foster
The integrity of our elections is in danger, and we need your help
You’re probably here looking for facts. Thank you for that trust. But with the EU parliament elections on the way and more elections a possibility, we need to act now to make sure our elections are protected, before it’s too late.
Could you help protect our elections by becoming a Full Fact donor?
Misinformation isn’t new, but advancements in technology mean it can spread at an unprecedented scale. Our dangerously outdated election laws have not kept up with the digital age, putting our next elections at risk of abuse.
Currently, it’s possible for a candidate to run a thousand different political ads to win the same seat, promising something different to each group it targets. At the same time, there’s no law requiring those who publish online campaigns to disclose who they are or how they are funded. The opportunity for bad actors to manipulate election results is left wide open.
You may already know about our work to make public debate online more honest and transparent. Every day, we call out the most harmful misinformation on social media platforms when and where we see it. But right now, we’re urging the government to overhaul our election laws to make sure political campaigning is held to the same level of scrutiny online as it is offline.
This work all depends on the generosity of hundreds of people who all believe that for democracy to work, we need transparency. Our monthly donors help strengthen our voice, and show our politicians that this really matters. Would you consider joining them?
Become a donor today to make sure our elections are protected.