The budget deficit has fallen by two thirds since 2009/10, just before the Coalition came into power.
In 2010 the budget deficit was running at over 10% of the UK’s GDP.
Claim 1 of 2
“We inherited in 2010 a budget deficit that was running at over 10% of our GDP and we have brought that down by two thirds over the last six years.”
Philip Hammond, BBC Radio 4, 24 November 2016
Those figures are correct.
In 2009/10, the year before the coalition government came into power, government borrowing equalled just over 10% of UK’s gross domestic product (GDP), the value of what we produced as an economy that year. In 2015/16 it equalled 4% of GDP, and it’s forecast to fall to 3.5% in 2016/17, a fall of near enough two thirds.
‘Public sector net borrowing’ is the headline measure of the government’s budget deficit. It’s the difference between the government’s income (mainly taxes) and everything it spends on public services, investment, and debt interest.
One reason for the fall in borrowing as a proportion of GDP since 2010 is that the government spent less. The cash value of the government’s deficit fell by about half. In 2009/10 the government borrowed about £155 billion; in 2015/16 it borrowed about £76 billion.
Another reason why borrowing fell as a percentage of GDP was that GDP got bigger. The cash value of UK GDP rose by almost a quarter, from about £1,530 billion in 2009/10 to about £1,880 billion in 2015/16.
The Coalition government had said it was going to reduce the deficit by more than that. In its first budget, it said that it would eliminate what’s called the ‘cyclically-adjusted current budget deficit’ by 2015/16.
That’s a narrower measure of the government’s deficit. It doesn’t include investment spending, and it’s adjusted to take into account of whether the economy is in a ‘boom’ or ‘bust’ period. Over the past 10 years, the cyclically-adjusted current deficit has been about half of public sector net borrowing.
By focusing on the cyclically-adjusted current budget deficit, the coalition government aimed to avoid creating an incentive to cut investment spending unnecessarily, and to give itself the flexibility to deal with potential economic crises.
By implication, the broader measure ‘public sector net borrowing’, which Mr Hammond was referring to, didn’t fall by as much as the Coalition hoped for either.
The integrity of our elections is in danger, and we need your help
You’re probably here looking for facts. Thank you for that trust. But with the EU parliament elections on the way and more elections a possibility, we need to act now to make sure our elections are protected, before it’s too late.
Could you help protect our elections by becoming a Full Fact donor?
Misinformation isn’t new, but advancements in technology mean it can spread at an unprecedented scale. Our dangerously outdated election laws have not kept up with the digital age, putting our next elections at risk of abuse.
Currently, it’s possible for a candidate to run a thousand different political ads to win the same seat, promising something different to each group it targets. At the same time, there’s no law requiring those who publish online campaigns to disclose who they are or how they are funded. The opportunity for bad actors to manipulate election results is left wide open.
You may already know about our work to make public debate online more honest and transparent. Every day, we call out the most harmful misinformation on social media platforms when and where we see it. But right now, we’re urging the government to overhaul our election laws to make sure political campaigning is held to the same level of scrutiny online as it is offline.
This work all depends on the generosity of hundreds of people who all believe that for democracy to work, we need transparency. Our monthly donors help strengthen our voice, and show our politicians that this really matters. Would you consider joining them?
Become a donor today to make sure our elections are protected.