Housing Benefit spending has risen by £4 billion.
Correct. The rise was £4.3 billion between 2009/10 and 2014/15 according to the Department for Work and Pensions, or £2.3 billion adjusted for inflation.
“Mr Speaker, the Housing Benefit bill has gone up by more than £4 billion because of high levels of rent and the necessity of supporting people in that.”
Jeremy Corbyn, 2 November 2016
“If he thinks that the amount of money being spent on Housing Benefit is so important, why did he oppose the changes we made to Housing Benefit to reduce the Housing Benefit bill?”
Theresa May, 2 November 2016
Mr Corbyn is correct on his raw figures. The Housing Benefit bill did rise from around £20 billion in 2009/10 to over £24 billion in 2014/15, according to the Department for Work and Pensions. Spending for the last financial year hasn’t been confirmed, but is expected to be around the same.
This is without adjusting for inflation, though. In real terms the increase is more like £2.3 billion rather than £4.3 billion.
Housing Benefit is around 14-15% of total benefit expenditure.
Although the increase is at least partly down to a rise in the number of people getting it, the amount paid out per person has also risen slightly. If we divide real terms expenditure by caseload, it comes to just over £5,000 per recipient in 2014/15, where it had been £4,900 in 2009/10. (This crude average doesn’t tell us anything about what individuals typically receive.)
But Mrs May is right that the bill is set to fall. Policy changes since 2010 are due to realise real terms savings of over £5 billion by 2020/21, according to analysis by the House of Commons Library. While spending will still be higher than in 2010 in cash terms, it’ll be down after adjusting for inflation, assuming the forecasts are correct.
The biggest forecast saving, some £3 billion, is to come from reducing social rents—and so the amount of Housing Benefit paid out to cover them—by 1% a year for four years. Mr Corbyn voted against that measure in July 2015.
He said today, in response to Mrs May, that “my concern [is]... the incredible amount of money being paid into the private rented sector [because of] excessive rents”.
This factcheck is part of a roundup of Prime Minister's Questions. Read the roundup.
The integrity of our elections is in danger, and we need your help
You’re probably here looking for facts. Thank you for that trust. But with the EU parliament elections on the way and more elections a possibility, we need to act now to make sure our elections are protected, before it’s too late.
Could you help protect our elections by becoming a Full Fact donor?
Misinformation isn’t new, but advancements in technology mean it can spread at an unprecedented scale. Our dangerously outdated election laws have not kept up with the digital age, putting our next elections at risk of abuse.
Currently, it’s possible for a candidate to run a thousand different political ads to win the same seat, promising something different to each group it targets. At the same time, there’s no law requiring those who publish online campaigns to disclose who they are or how they are funded. The opportunity for bad actors to manipulate election results is left wide open.
You may already know about our work to make public debate online more honest and transparent. Every day, we call out the most harmful misinformation on social media platforms when and where we see it. But right now, we’re urging the government to overhaul our election laws to make sure political campaigning is held to the same level of scrutiny online as it is offline.
This work all depends on the generosity of hundreds of people who all believe that for democracy to work, we need transparency. Our monthly donors help strengthen our voice, and show our politicians that this really matters. Would you consider joining them?
Become a donor today to make sure our elections are protected.