"We have a structural budget deficit—we spend more than we collect in taxes—and that is not going to be fixed by economic growth alone."—George Osborne, 4 June 2015
The Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne, welcomed his new opposite number Chris Leslie to the Commons last Friday by wishing him "the same success that his predecessors enjoyed". Business as usual, then.
Slightly more unusual was Mr. Osborne's description of the budget deficit—a subject the Chancellor is usually pretty sharp on.
The Chancellor could be making two separate - accurate - points. But read together it looks inaccurate: the government spending more than it receives doesn't mean its running a structural deficit. Not all deficits are structural.
A structural deficit means that the government would be borrowing when the economy was 'in the middle' of the business cycle—so in neither an upturn nor in a downturn.
The distinction is fairly important. Take an economy in a boom period. Output and employment are high, so tax revenues are likely to be above their 'normal' level while spending on things like unemployment benefits is likely to be lower.
The government could then be running a surplus simply because of where the economy is in the business cycle, while still having a structural deficit.
This year, the government is expected to borrow about £75.3 billion. The structural deficit is expected to be slightly lower at £68.8 billion. While the UK is expected to be one of the fastest growing G7 nations this year, the economy is producing below its 'natural' level of output. If the economy were operating at this level, then the deficit would be about £6.5 billion lower.
The integrity of our elections is in danger, and we need your help
You’re probably here looking for facts. Thank you for that trust. But with the EU parliament elections on the way and more elections a possibility, we need to act now to make sure our elections are protected, before it’s too late.
Could you help protect our elections by becoming a Full Fact donor?
Misinformation isn’t new, but advancements in technology mean it can spread at an unprecedented scale. Our dangerously outdated election laws have not kept up with the digital age, putting our next elections at risk of abuse.
Currently, it’s possible for a candidate to run a thousand different political ads to win the same seat, promising something different to each group it targets. At the same time, there’s no law requiring those who publish online campaigns to disclose who they are or how they are funded. The opportunity for bad actors to manipulate election results is left wide open.
You may already know about our work to make public debate online more honest and transparent. Every day, we call out the most harmful misinformation on social media platforms when and where we see it. But right now, we’re urging the government to overhaul our election laws to make sure political campaigning is held to the same level of scrutiny online as it is offline.
This work all depends on the generosity of hundreds of people who all believe that for democracy to work, we need transparency. Our monthly donors help strengthen our voice, and show our politicians that this really matters. Would you consider joining them?
Become a donor today to make sure our elections are protected.