The Coalition's original debt target has been met.
It has, but the IFS says this is "not a genuine reduction in government indebtedness". The fall in 2015/16 is only because the government is selling assts.
"The original debt target I set out in my first Budget has been met. We will end this Parliament with Britain's national debt share falling"—George Osborne, 2015 Budget
It had aimed to get public sector net debt falling as a share of GDP in 2015/16.
The December forecast from the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) said this wasn't going to happen. Yesterday's forecast predicts that it will.
A few things have changed since December, but the main driver of this apparent success is the government's decision to sell £20 billion worth of assets in 2015-16.
This means selling things like some of the government's shares in Lloyds Banking Group.
But the OBR makes clear: "Financial asset sales bring forward cash that would otherwise have been received in the future in the shape of mortgage repayments and dividends, so they only temporarily reduce the debt-to-GDP ratio. In broad terms, they leave the public sector's net worth unchanged."
The Institute for Fiscal Studies agrees, saying this is "not a genuine reduction in government indebtedness".
The debt is forecast to fall anyway from 2016/17, but the Chancellor's announcement isn't as exciting as it might seem.
The integrity of our elections is in danger, and we need your help
You’re probably here looking for facts. Thank you for that trust. But with the EU parliament elections on the way and more elections a possibility, we need to act now to make sure our elections are protected, before it’s too late.
Could you help protect our elections by becoming a Full Fact donor?
Misinformation isn’t new, but advancements in technology mean it can spread at an unprecedented scale. Our dangerously outdated election laws have not kept up with the digital age, putting our next elections at risk of abuse.
Currently, it’s possible for a candidate to run a thousand different political ads to win the same seat, promising something different to each group it targets. At the same time, there’s no law requiring those who publish online campaigns to disclose who they are or how they are funded. The opportunity for bad actors to manipulate election results is left wide open.
You may already know about our work to make public debate online more honest and transparent. Every day, we call out the most harmful misinformation on social media platforms when and where we see it. But right now, we’re urging the government to overhaul our election laws to make sure political campaigning is held to the same level of scrutiny online as it is offline.
This work all depends on the generosity of hundreds of people who all believe that for democracy to work, we need transparency. Our monthly donors help strengthen our voice, and show our politicians that this really matters. Would you consider joining them?
Become a donor today to make sure our elections are protected.