"Under Labour our nurseries became the priciest in Europe."
Daily Mail, 10 May 2013
"The real cost of child care, which every family in this country faces, has risen by 77% in real terms since 2003, and child care inflation is going up by 6% every year... At present, we have the tightest ratios in Europe for children under three."
Elizabeth Truss, House of Commons, 9 May 2013
"The UK has some of the most expensive childcare in Europe as well as the tightest ratios and the government is committed to improving accessibility to high-quality childcare."
Last week an episode of Newsnight revealed that the Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg had raised concerns over the Government's plan to allow a greater number of children per adult in nurseries. If the plans were to fall through, it could mean that the budget for the childcare programme will have to undergo a review.
The Childcare Minister Elizabeth Truss was in the House of Commons yesterday defending the Government's plans, which are intended to drive down childcare costs. A few weeks ago she was quoted in the Daily Mail eulogising French nurseries.
So how do our nurseries compare to the rest of Europe? And are they really so expensive? Let's take a look at the evidence.
The loosening of ratios for childminders and in nurseries will mean that one childminder will be able to look after four children, instead of three at present. Staff with higher qualifications will be allowed to look after more children. Liz Truss told the House of Commons that:
"The ratio for two-year-olds in England is 4:1, whereas it is 6:1 in Ireland, 6:1 in Germany and 8:1 in France, while in Denmark and Sweden—countries that the shadow Secretary of State has explicitly advocated—there are no national staff ratios at all."
The table below - from a January 2013 Government report on childcare - confirms this. The data was collected by the Department for Education (DfE) through a survey of OECD countries in 2012:
So Liz Truss was correct to point out that the UK's staff-to-child rules are more stringent than other European countries, although there are some variations in how each country actually implements their ratios.
A European Commission dossier on the provision of childcare says that in the UK there are still problems with availability. It points to:
"a mismatch of supply and demand across the country, with sizeable vacancies in day care, out-of-school and childminder places in some areas and heavy shortages in others."
A report by Ms Truss for the think-tank Centre Forum suggests that our child-adult ratios are one of the reasons why the UK is failing to secure value for money.
So how are we doing with childcare costs?
Childcare costs and Labour's legacy
Every year the Daycare Trust publishes a Childcare Costs Survey, compiled from figures submitted by Family Information Services. The survey found that the average cost of a nursery place for a child under two is now £4.26 per hour across Britain (£5.33 per hour in London). So a parent buying 50 hours of childcare per week would face an average annual bill of around £11,000 per year.
The survey also shows that childcare prices are rising at "significantly above" inflation in England. Costs for after-school clubs, nursery and childminder places for the over-twos rose by more than 5 per cent over the last 12 months.
As Liz Truss claimed in Parliament, the survey found that a nursery place for a child aged two or under is now "77 per cent more expensive than it was in 2003".
The graph below illustrates how the growth in childcare costs has risen since 2003, whilst the real terms average wage has fallen.
When considering childcare costs, the OECD's family database includes fees less financial assistance, such as cash benefits, rebates and tax concessions. It also looks at gross childcare costs, net childcare costs as a percentage of family income or as a percentage of the average wage.
The charts below (for two different family types) confirm that net childcare costs (taking benefits into account) are relatively high in the UK compared to other countries, and almost the highest for certain dual-earning couples. It was published by the OECD in 2010, but it uses data from 2004.
So there's some evidence to suggest that childcare costs were among the 'priciest' in Europe in 2004, but as yet it isn't clear how the Daily Mail established that childcare became the priciest under Labour, as we weren't able to find figures prior to 2004.
More up-to-date information can be found in a 2011 OECD report, "Doing Better for Families". According to this report, for an average earning couple we have the second highest costs of childcare for any OECD country in terms of average family incomes (27% compared to the OECD average of 12%) and the third highest compared to the average wage (41% against to the OCED average of 18%):
Flickr image courtesy of Global Partnership for Education
Full Fact wants to see greater accountability for public figures who mislead us—and we need your help.
Political debate in the UK is in flux right now. The UK’s exit from the European Union is approaching, we will soon have a new prime minister and potentially a general election.
We want politicians to tell the truth, and while the best politicians realise that their work should be done honestly, some aren't taking their responsibilities seriously. Both sides in the EU referendum campaign let voters down, from deceptively designed leaflets to some of the arguments made on each side. The public rightly expects more from politicians.
We want to see greater accountability for public figures who mislead. Full Fact will continue to advocate for higher standards and call out those who don't uphold them.
But we rely on the generosity of our supporters to make sure we can spot the most harmful misinformation when we most need to.
Can you help us?
Support better public debate today.