Day to day funding for schools per pupil stayed at roughly the same level from 2010/11 to 2015/16, once rising prices are taken into account.
After that, funding per pupil fell and since 2017/18 it has flattened out. Funding from 2017/18 to 2019/20 remains lower than 2015 levels.
New funding reforms underway should share out the available funding more consistently through a National Funding Formula (NFF). The NFF itself won’t change the size of the total schools budget, but will mean some schools get more funding, and some schools get less funding.
A full roll out of these reforms has been put on hold until at least 2020/21.
The schools budget: how much money is there?
The schools budget for pupils aged 5-16 in England is expected to be nearly £39 billion for 2017/18. A further £3 billion is being spent on early years provision.
The government has said that school funding is at “record levels”. This is correct in terms of how many pounds are in the budget, but inflation and increasing pupil numbers mean per-pupil funding has fallen since 2015.
This means that school spending per pupil will still be less than it was in 2015/16, but instead of continuing to fall between 2017/18 and 2019/20 it will stay roughly the same per pupil, according to the IFS.
This additional money for schools comes entirely from other areas in the education budget, the government has said. For example, £420 million has come from the budget used to repair and fund school buildings, and £280 million has come from the budget for new free schools.
How the school funding system works
State-funded schools fall into two main groups: maintained schools, where funding and oversight is through local authorities, and academies, where funding and oversight is from the Department for Education. Free schools are a type of academy.
Up until recently, the government has decided how much of the budget to hand over to each local authority, largely based on how much each authority has received per pupil in previous years. Each local authority then uses a local funding formula to share this money out to local schools. They take into account several factors such as pupil numbers, deprivation, and prior attainment.
Although outside of the control of local authorities, the money used to fund academies and free schools is still calculated using the local funding formulas.
The old funding system has been widely seen as flawed
Part of this is intentional, the IFS has said, because of deliberate choices by the government to target funding towards disadvantaged schools and areas with higher costs.
But some variation has been more unintentional.
The IFS has said “funding levels have become increasingly divorced from the reality of what local authorities look like today” because the money going to each local authority has been largely based on what they were like in the early 2000s.
This has meant that there is wide variation in funding per pupil across similar schools in England. One example the IFS gave is that:
“Plymouth and Bradford have similar characteristics (e.g. both have about 17% of pupils eligible for free school meals), but funding per pupil is around £500 higher in Bradford than it is in Plymouth. This is largely because back in 2004 there was a significant gap, with about 24% of pupils eligible for free school meals in Bradford and 16% in Plymouth in 2004.”
It also said that different local authorities making different choices over how to allocate school funding can mean that similar schools receive different levels of funding.
The schools funding system is changing from 152 local formulas to one nationwide formula
The government is introducing a new funding system which aims to take into account similar factors to the local funding formulas, but replace the 152 local formulas with a single National Funding Formula (NFF).
It applies to maintained schools, academies, and free schools, and recalculates the core funding that schools receive from the government for pupils aged 5-16.
The reforms aim to make the system more transparent, more uniform, and use an up-to-date assessment of need.
The National Funding Formula has a complicated outcome on budgets depending on the kind of school
The IFS has said that the proposed formula largely preserves the intentional variation under the old system where certain types of schools or areas receive better funding. But the intention is to ensure that similar schools receive similar funding.
Both of their analyses were done before the government made further funding announcements in September 2017 designed to ease transition to the new formula, so the exact picture may change.
Although the funding changes are calculated on a school-by-school basis, one broad implication from the pre-September IFS analysis is that the biggest losers will be schools in Inner London. They currently receive the highest funding per pupil.
The EPI found that “the most disadvantaged primary and secondary schools in London are expected to see an overall loss of around £16.1m by 2019/20”.
Updated figures released by the Department for Education in September suggest Inner London local authorities will still see the biggest losses on average. The schools that were expected to benefit most were those outside London with a “middling proportion of students from disadvantaged backgrounds”, according to the IFS. It also found that there is a shift in funding towards small primary schools and large secondary schools.
A transitional period of ‘soft’ NFF has been introduced
In July 2017, the government announced that instead of a complete ‘hard’ roll out of reforms, a transitional ‘soft’ rollout of the NFF would take place from 2018/19 to 2019/20.
This transitional ‘soft’ version of the NFF calculates what each school would receive under the ‘hard’ NFF. It then applies certain transitional rules—for example, there is a protective cap so every school’s notional funding increases by at least 0.5% per pupil in cash terms during 2018/19.
The government then adds the school budgets together for each local authority and hands the money over to them.
The local authorities then still divide the money up under their own terms, and so will set each school’s budget for the next two years. They can reduce a school’s budget for the year by up to 1.5% per pupil, if they wish.
So this reduces any sudden changes to a school’s budget but means schools have to wait longer for funding to become more consistent (although some of the transitional rules seek to address this).
We don’t know what government plans are for school funding after 2019/20, although the government says it intends to introduce the hard NFF formula.
This spreadsheet from the Department for Education shows how a hypothetical full NFF roll this year would affect each school’s cash budget.
Correction 12 February 2018
We changed a typo in the graph accompanying this article. It read "South Wales" instead of "South West".
Correction 26 April 2018
We added "per pupil" to the sentence "This means that school spending per pupil will still be less than it was in 2015/16...".
The integrity of our elections is in danger, and we need your help
You’re probably here looking for facts. Thank you for that trust. But with the EU parliament elections on the way and more elections a possibility, we need to act now to make sure our elections are protected, before it’s too late.
Could you help protect our elections by becoming a Full Fact donor?
Misinformation isn’t new, but advancements in technology mean it can spread at an unprecedented scale. Our dangerously outdated election laws have not kept up with the digital age, putting our next elections at risk of abuse.
Currently, it’s possible for a candidate to run a thousand different political ads to win the same seat, promising something different to each group it targets. At the same time, there’s no law requiring those who publish online campaigns to disclose who they are or how they are funded. The opportunity for bad actors to manipulate election results is left wide open.
You may already know about our work to make public debate online more honest and transparent. Every day, we call out the most harmful misinformation on social media platforms when and where we see it. But right now, we’re urging the government to overhaul our election laws to make sure political campaigning is held to the same level of scrutiny online as it is offline.
This work all depends on the generosity of hundreds of people who all believe that for democracy to work, we need transparency. Our monthly donors help strengthen our voice, and show our politicians that this really matters. Would you consider joining them?
Become a donor today to make sure our elections are protected.