The 2016 EU referendum was the largest democratic exercise in the UK’s history.
Not quite. More people voted in the 1992 general election. It also had a higher turnout rate, as did other elections in the 20th century.
The 17.4 million votes to leave the EU in 2016 was the largest mandate for anything in British political history.
No single electoral option has received more votes in UK history than the vote to leave the EU in 2016. But a handful of referendum options and political parties have received a higher percentage share of a national vote.
Claim 1 of 2
“Who now represents the 17.4million Leave voters – the largest mandate for anything in British political history?”
Spiked, 25 October 2018
“The referendum in 2016 was the biggest democratic exercise in our history”
Lord Callanan, 11 March 2019
“If you look back to what happened in the referendum, we saw the biggest democratic exercise in our history.”
Theresa May, 22 March 2019
“Labour are pushing for a divisive second referendum which rips up their manifesto pledge to respect the result of the largest democratic exercise in our nation’s history and would take us back to square one.”
Brandon Lewis MP, 1 April 2019
Over recent months, we have heard a number of government ministers, including the Prime Minster, claim that the 2016 EU referendum was the “largest” or “biggest” “democratic exercise” in the UK’s history.
This is not correct, if you interpret “largest democratic exercise” as the number of people participating in a vote. 33,551,983 people cast a vote in the referendum—which was 72% of all people registered to vote.
On neither of these measures was it the biggest democratic exercise in UK history. But it was pretty close to being so.
Slightly more votes—33,614,074—were cast in the 1992 general election, which was won by John Major’s Conservative Party.
Was it the largest mandate?
A separate but related claim is that the 17.4 million votes in favour of leaving the EU was “the largest mandate for anything in British political history”. This is a more accurate version of the claim.
A mandate can be understood, in this sense, as the democratic authority given by the people to the government to do something.
Depending on how you define a mandate, it’s reasonable to say that Brexit has the largest ever mandate given for something in the UK, as more people voted for it than any other single electoral option in British political history. 17,410,742 people voted in favour of leaving the EU in 2016, which is fractionally higher than the 17,378,581 people who voted in favour of staying in the European Community in 1975.
In percentage terms, it’s not the biggest mandate in history. Of those who voted, 52% of people voted to leave the EU in 2016, compared to 67% of people who voted to stay in the European Community in 1975, the 68% who voted against changing the electoral system in 2011, or the 55% who voted for the Conservative party at the 1931 general election.
The lifespan of a claim
Using in-house technology, we’ve traced how long the “biggest/largest democratic exercise” claim has been circulating for, and how frequently it is made.
What we see is that, despite a few sporadic mentions beforehand, this claim only really took off in autumn last year, around the time the government started using it as one if its official lines. Since then, it has received significant media coverage, particularly after big speeches, and has been adopted by backbench MPs and opponents of the government’s Brexit plans.
In July 2018, the government published a document setting out its plans for the future relationship with the EU, which was dubbed the “Chequers proposal”. The first line of that document, from the Prime Minister’s foreword, is:
“In the referendum on 23 June 2016—the largest ever democratic exercise in the United Kingdom—the British people voted to leave the European Union.”
The Prime Minister used similar phrasing again in September 2018, in a speech to the nation. The speech was widely reported in the national media, which led to the first widespread coverage of the “largest democratic exercise” claim. The claim got another flurry of coverage in early October, following an interview with Theresa May at the Conservative Party conference, at which time Jacob Rees-Mogg also made the claim.
Prior to Theresa May’s speech in September 2018, the phrase had been used only four times in parliament. In the seven months since, it has been used eleven times—in five cases by government ministers, and in six cases by Conservative backbench MPs.
An accurate version of this claim has been replaced by an inaccurate one
Interestingly, the government did use an accurate variant of this phrase, using more qualified language, immediately after the referendum in June 2016.
On 27 June 2016, David Cameron began a statement to MPs on the result of the EU referendum with the following:
“Last week saw one of the biggest democratic exercises in our history.”
The addition of “one of” made this an accurate claim, and the government repeated variants of it in the months after the referendum. Overall, this correct claim has been made ten times in parliament, all by government ministers.
However, following sporadic usage in 2016 and 2017, the claim has not been made in parliament since March 2018.
The integrity of our elections is in danger, and we need your help
You’re probably here looking for facts. Thank you for that trust. But with the EU parliament elections on the way and more elections a possibility, we need to act now to make sure our elections are protected, before it’s too late.
Could you help protect our elections by becoming a Full Fact donor?
Misinformation isn’t new, but advancements in technology mean it can spread at an unprecedented scale. Our dangerously outdated election laws have not kept up with the digital age, putting our next elections at risk of abuse.
Currently, it’s possible for a candidate to run a thousand different political ads to win the same seat, promising something different to each group it targets. At the same time, there’s no law requiring those who publish online campaigns to disclose who they are or how they are funded. The opportunity for bad actors to manipulate election results is left wide open.
You may already know about our work to make public debate online more honest and transparent. Every day, we call out the most harmful misinformation on social media platforms when and where we see it. But right now, we’re urging the government to overhaul our election laws to make sure political campaigning is held to the same level of scrutiny online as it is offline.
This work all depends on the generosity of hundreds of people who all believe that for democracy to work, we need transparency. Our monthly donors help strengthen our voice, and show our politicians that this really matters. Would you consider joining them?
Become a donor today to make sure our elections are protected.