The overwhelming majority of other EU countries have no steel industry to protect.
Incorrect. Seven EU countries produce more steel than the UK, including large economies like Germany, Italy, and France. The UK is responsible for 4% of the EU’s crude steel production.
If the UK were in a customs union with the EU, we’ll be reliant on the European Union to protect our steel industry.
Being in a customs union with the EU means we have to apply the same tariffs on steel imports as the rest of the EU does.
Claim 1 of 2
“If (Labour MPs) want to protect UK industries such as the steel industry from unfair dumping at below market prices, they should bear in mind that if we’re in a customs union they’ll be reliant on the European Union to protect our industry. And the overwhelming majority of the remaining EU27 probably quite like buying Chinese steel or whatever below world prices because they have no steel industry to protect.”
Andrew Bridgen MP, 1 April 2018 (54:40)
Andrew Bridgen—a Conservative Party MP and Brexit supporter—claims that the “overwhelming majority” of EU member states have no steel industry.
This is incorrect. The UK is responsible for around 4% of the EU’s crude steel production, and seven EU countries produced more crude steel than the UK in 2017. These countries include the EU’s economic heavyweights: Germany was responsible for 26% of all EU crude steel production; Italy for 14%; and France for 9%.
Being in a customs union means setting the same tariffs as the EU
Aside from the fact that he is wrong about steel production levels, Andrew Bridgen was trying to make a point about what happens to tariffs if the UK enters a customs union with the EU after Brexit. The implication being if the UK remained in a customs union with the EU it would have to follow whatever tariffs the EU sets on steel.
This is correct. Under the rules of a customs union, all members have to set the same external tariffs on goods. So if the UK and EU are in a customs union, they have to set the same tariffs on steel imports.
The EU is already taking action against steel dumping
Mr Bridgen seems to be implying that the UK steel industry could be undermined by being in a customs union with the EU, as the EU might allow the ‘dumping’ of Chinese steel into Europe—where it is sold for below its market price.
The EU is at least somewhat concerned about steel dumping already, as recent actions show.
For example, last October, the EU extended anti-dumping measures against certain steel products from Russia and Ukraine for five years. Under these measures, certain products from these two countries carry import tariffs of between 12% and 36%.
In February 2019, the EU put into place a “definitive safeguard” on steel imports. The safeguard covers 26 steel product categories, and applies quotas on how much of these products can be imported to the EU tariff-free. Once the quota has been surpassed, an import tariff of 25% is applied.
If the UK wasn’t in a customs union it could, if it wanted to, set higher tariffs on steel imports than those set by the EU (as for instance, the USA has done). But it’s not clear that the UK would choose to do so. The UK has backed previous duties imposed on steel imports by the EU, but also objected to some proposals to raise duties. The UK government was also critical of the decision to raise steel import tariffs in the US last year.
Full Fact wants to see greater accountability for public figures who mislead us—and we need your help.
Political debate in the UK is in flux right now. The UK’s exit from the European Union is approaching, we will soon have a new prime minister and potentially a general election.
We want politicians to tell the truth, and while the best politicians realise that their work should be done honestly, some aren't taking their responsibilities seriously. Both sides in the EU referendum campaign let voters down, from deceptively designed leaflets to some of the arguments made on each side. The public rightly expects more from politicians.
We want to see greater accountability for public figures who mislead. Full Fact will continue to advocate for higher standards and call out those who don't uphold them.
But we rely on the generosity of our supporters to make sure we can spot the most harmful misinformation when we most need to.
Can you help us?
Support better public debate today.