The Prime Minister’s renegotiation deal on the UK’s European Union membership is a package of changes to EU rules. It was agreed by European leaders on 19 February 2016. In this series of articles, some of the country’s leading experts in EU law explain the deal and what it changes.
Free movement of people in EU law
EU law sets up the free movement of goods, people, services and capital.
This means that goods can be exported from one EU country and imported into another.
The same applies to people: they can leave their home EU country (France, say) and enter a ‘host’ country (such as the UK) to live and to work.
But they are not absolute or unconditional. The host country can interfere with free movement rights for reasons like public policy, public security and public health.
These are the ‘derogations’, or exceptions to free movement.
Some exceptions from the general rule of free movement are allowed
In the case of people (not goods, services or capital), the detail of when the interference can occur is in the so-called Citizens’ Rights Directive.
In essence, this law says that the longer a migrant lives in the host country the more rights they get and the harder it is to remove them. It allows:
- 0-3 months when the UK can refuse individuals entry or deport them for public policy, public security and public health reasons
- 3 months – 5 years when the UK can deport individuals for public policy and public security reasons
- 5 years – 10 years when the UK can deport individuals for serious reasons of public policy and public security
- 10 years plus when the UK can deport individuals for imperative reasons of public security
There have been a lot of cases at the EU court working out what the various terms mean, especially “public policy”. The Citizens’ Rights Directive sums them up by saying that:
- Public policy or public security decisions to deport someone should be “proportionate”, and based exclusively on the behaviour of the individual involved
- Previous criminal convictions aren’t on their own a valid reason to deport someone
- The person’s behaviour must be a “genuine, present and sufficiently serious threat affecting one of the fundamental interests of society”
- Countries can’t deport a person just to make an example of them
By beefing up the exceptions, the EU deal makes deporting people easier
Although not as eye-catching as some of the other changes put forward, the revisions to the ‘derogations’ subtly alter the balance of power between individual and state, making it easier for countries like the UK to deport individuals.
First, the deal allows host countries to keep out or deport people whose behaviour is “likely (as opposed to “does”) to represent a genuine and serious threat to public policy or security”.
Second, the deal takes the emphasis away from present conduct by individuals to look much more closely at their past:
“In determining whether the conduct of an individual poses a present threat to public policy or security, Member States may take into account past conduct of the individual concerned”.
The deal adds for the first time that “the threat may not always need to be imminent”. Also new is saying that governments, even in the absence of a previous criminal conviction, can deport EU immigrants on “preventative grounds”.
The European Commission, or administration, has also committed as part of the deal to drafting a law containing these changes.
It will also put out guidelines on the meaning of “serious grounds of public policy or public security” and “imperative grounds of public security”, the phrases currently used for considering whether an individual can be deported after five years and 10 years respectively (see above).
When the Citizens’ Rights Directive is next amended, the Commission will look into changing these lengths of time.
These changes don’t deliver on the Prime Minister’s previous proposals for “tougher and longer” re-entry bans for foreign rough sleepers, beggars and fraudsters. But they do qualify as “stronger powers to deport criminals and stop them coming back”.
Update 22 February
We revised the article to take into account the final version of the EU deal published on 19 February, rather than the draft of 2 February as in the original.
The integrity of our elections is in danger, and we need your help
You’re probably here looking for facts. Thank you for that trust. But with the EU parliament elections on the way and more elections a possibility, we need to act now to make sure our elections are protected, before it’s too late.
Could you help protect our elections by becoming a Full Fact donor?
Misinformation isn’t new, but advancements in technology mean it can spread at an unprecedented scale. Our dangerously outdated election laws have not kept up with the digital age, putting our next elections at risk of abuse.
Currently, it’s possible for a candidate to run a thousand different political ads to win the same seat, promising something different to each group it targets. At the same time, there’s no law requiring those who publish online campaigns to disclose who they are or how they are funded. The opportunity for bad actors to manipulate election results is left wide open.
You may already know about our work to make public debate online more honest and transparent. Every day, we call out the most harmful misinformation on social media platforms when and where we see it. But right now, we’re urging the government to overhaul our election laws to make sure political campaigning is held to the same level of scrutiny online as it is offline.
This work all depends on the generosity of hundreds of people who all believe that for democracy to work, we need transparency. Our monthly donors help strengthen our voice, and show our politicians that this really matters. Would you consider joining them?
Become a donor today to make sure our elections are protected.