The EU is the only place where free ports don’t really exist.
Free ports do exist within the EU, although in a more limited form than elsewhere in the world.
The EU has stopped the UK from having free ports.
Incorrect. Free ports exist within the EU. The UK had free ports until 2012. However, EU law means free ports exist in a more limited form than elsewhere in the world.
Claim 1 of 2
“The EU is the only place where these [free ports] really don’t exist…”
Rishi Sunak MP, 1 August 2019
“[We can] use that opportunity of Brexit to do the kind of things that we’ve been precluded from doing for decades, including free ports…”
James Cleverly MP, 2 August 2019
On the Today programme, Chief Secretary to the Treasury Rishi Sunak claimed that the EU doesn’t “really” have free ports—areas within a country that have different customs rules. The next day Conservative party chairman James Cleverly almost repeated the claim, saying that the EU has precluded the UK from having free ports for decades.
Mr Cleverly is simply incorrect to say that the EU has stopped the UK from having free ports for decades. There are free ports in the EU. There were free ports in the UK until 2012, when UK legislation establishing them expired.
The word “really” in Mr Sunak’s claim is doing some heavy lifting and refers to the fact that EU free ports are more limited in their powers than other free ports around the world.
What is a free port?
Typically, when goods enter a country, they have to follow the import regulations of that country. This often involves a tariff—a tax on those imports.
A free port or “free zone” is an area that is inside the geographic boundary of a country, but which is legally considered outside the country for customs purposes. Goods brought into the free port don’t face import tariffs (though if they are then sent into the rest of the country for sale, they are then taxed accordingly).
Sometimes businesses operating within free ports receive other incentives, such as tax breaks. For example the Canary Islands Free Zone has a corporate tax rate of 4% compared to 25% in the rest of Spain.
There are various economic benefits to free ports outlined in a paper authored by Mr Sunak in 2016. Conversely there have been criticisms of free ports that they can be used by organisations to launder money and avoid tax.
One claimed benefit is that free ports can boost manufacturing.
For example, imagine the process of assembling a car. A car manufacturer might produce the individual components in different countries because that might be where the expertise is, or where the raw materials are from.
But they then have to assemble the car in one place. Without any free ports, they would have to export all those components to one country, facing import tariffs on the components, assemble the car and then export the finished vehicles from there.
But with a free port, a manufacturer could transport all the components to a factory within the free port area tariff-free. This gives manufacturers a tax incentive to situate production within free port areas.
Free ports within the EU
However, some experts have claimed that EU law limits the scope of free ports.
Professor of EU law Catherine Barnard wrote last year that while there are many potential benefits of free ports, within the EU “it is not, however, easy for companies to benefit from these arrangements.”
“Approvals for FZ [free zones] are also subject to EU state aid rules.”
EU state aid rules generally prohibit EU governments from providing support to certain companies over their competitors. This can limit the abilities of member states setting up free ports with tax incentives (as this would essentially provide support for businesses within free ports compared to those outside of them).
Professor Barnard illustrated this, saying: “The difficulty of obtaining an FZ status can be illustrated by the Shannon FZ in the Republic of Ireland. The Shannon FZ was successfully launched in 1958 but, upon Ireland’s accession to the EU in 1973, the incentives in the Shannon FZ were limited in order to comply with EU state aid rules (e.g. the 0% corporate income tax was increased to 10%).”
EU rules also mean it’s more difficult for businesses to engage in something called “tariff inversion”. Because tariffs on component parts are often higher than tariffs on finished goods, it can be advantageous for a business to transport components to a free port, turn them into finished goods, and then import those finished goods into the rest of that country with a lower tariff.
A 2005 paper from a UN body said: “The [European] Commission does allow the establishment of free zones within its territory but its definition of free zone is a very narrow one.”
With Brexit fast approaching, reliable information is crucial.
If you’re here, you probably care about honesty. You’d like to see our politicians get their facts straight, back up what they say with evidence, and correct their mistakes. You know that reliable information matters.
There isn’t long to go until our scheduled departure from the EU and the House of Commons is divided. We need someone exactly like you to help us call out those who mislead the public—whatever their office, party, or stance on Brexit.
Will you take a stand for honesty in politics?