“EU action helped prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons; and the EU is leading the world on tackling climate change."
It’s correct that the EU helped to reach a deal with Iran on its nuclear programme. It worked with the United States and the ‘P5+1’ group—China, France, Russia, the UK, the US and Germany—on the deal.
The House of Commons Library said in 2013 that the role of the European powers in encouraging dialogue with Iran was “essentially the ‘carrot’ to the ‘stick’ of unwaveringly tough US stance”.
It seems fair to say the EU has been among a number of countries to push for tough action on climate change. The EU was part of the ‘High Ambition Coalition’ of over 100 countries which came through towards the end of the Paris Climate Change conference to push for a more ambitious agreement than had been the case.
Whether this means it’s “leading the world” is a matter of judgement. The government’s leaflet points to an article written by academics in the Georgetown Journal referring to the EU as the “leadiator” during climate change deals in the run up to the Paris climate change conference, saying it was leading in initiatives to reduce emissions and mediating with other countries. But the article questioned the sustainability of this position.
The Library has also described the EU as being at the forefront of negotiations to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Countries in the EU have reduced their total annual emissions by around 10% since 1992, and the proportion their emissions make up out of the world total has also fallen, according to its analysis.
The integrity of our elections is in danger, and we need your help
You’re probably here looking for facts. Thank you for that trust. But with the EU parliament elections on the way and more elections a possibility, we need to act now to make sure our elections are protected, before it’s too late.
Could you help protect our elections by becoming a Full Fact donor?
Misinformation isn’t new, but advancements in technology mean it can spread at an unprecedented scale. Our dangerously outdated election laws have not kept up with the digital age, putting our next elections at risk of abuse.
Currently, it’s possible for a candidate to run a thousand different political ads to win the same seat, promising something different to each group it targets. At the same time, there’s no law requiring those who publish online campaigns to disclose who they are or how they are funded. The opportunity for bad actors to manipulate election results is left wide open.
You may already know about our work to make public debate online more honest and transparent. Every day, we call out the most harmful misinformation on social media platforms when and where we see it. But right now, we’re urging the government to overhaul our election laws to make sure political campaigning is held to the same level of scrutiny online as it is offline.
This work all depends on the generosity of hundreds of people who all believe that for democracy to work, we need transparency. Our monthly donors help strengthen our voice, and show our politicians that this really matters. Would you consider joining them?
Become a donor today to make sure our elections are protected.