There aren’t any representative surveys of business opinion that we’re aware of
It’s difficult to get a representative picture of UK business opinion about the EU. As far as we’re aware, there aren’t any surveys that offer this on the UK’s membership of the EU.
It is hard to go further than that.
These are surveys of businesses that have chosen to join membership bodies. There are difficulties ensuring the surveys are representative of all members of those organisations and they will not be representative of businesses generally.
The Confederation of British Industry has pointed to 19 polls which it says show “all polls bar none show a majority of businesses want to remain in the EU”. These all face the same limitation—the vast majority are surveys of membership organisations, and the rest aren’t designed to be representative of the opinion of all UK businesses. They include:
- an survey by Deloitte of chief financial officers on its panel of UK companies making at least £1 million a year, with unweighted results
- a survey by private equity firm ECI of growth-focused companies
- a survey by Goldman Sachs of small businesses taking part in its small business programme
- a survey by financial adviser Grant Thornton UK LLP of some 125 senior staff at medium sized businesses
- a survey by Ipsos MORI of 100 senior figures in top UK companies
These surveys also often weren’t conducted in a way which made them representative of the types of businesses they were surveying, let alone of all businesses generally.
For example, the latest British Chambers of Commerce member survey showed a big difference in opinion between the exporters they surveyed, who were more likely to favour remaining in the EU, and the non-exporters, who slightly favoured leaving. That makes a difference to its overall results because the number of exporters among the respondents was disproportionately high.
Surveying business opinion is tricky
The bigger point here is that is very difficult to work out what types of businesses you’d need to survey, and what weights you would apply, to make the results representative of all businesses. For example, is it better to aim to represent the different numbers of employees of businesses, or how much money they make, or what sector they work in?
As the graph below shows, the different weights given to different business sizes can vary significantly depending on what you’re measuring.
No employees doesn’t necessarily mean the company doesn’t do anything. It can still mean the company has people working for it, such as sole traders and partnerships where the owners are the only people working for the business.
The other significant variation is industry, where different industries will have different levels of trade with the EU.
For all these reasons there are no representative surveys of business opinion on the EU referendum.
Some things we do know
There are some things we do have a more complete answer for.
Businesses have talked about the economic impact of leaving the EU, and how the referendum might affect trade, for example. We’ve got information about what the economic forecasts say about the impact of leaving the EU here, and about the UK’s trade with the EU—including how that might be affected if we left the EU—here. Or if you want to find out about the impact of EU regulation on businesses, we’ve covered that here.
The integrity of our elections is in danger, and we need your help
You’re probably here looking for facts. Thank you for that trust. But with the EU parliament elections on the way and more elections a possibility, we need to act now to make sure our elections are protected, before it’s too late.
Could you help protect our elections by becoming a Full Fact donor?
Misinformation isn’t new, but advancements in technology mean it can spread at an unprecedented scale. Our dangerously outdated election laws have not kept up with the digital age, putting our next elections at risk of abuse.
Currently, it’s possible for a candidate to run a thousand different political ads to win the same seat, promising something different to each group it targets. At the same time, there’s no law requiring those who publish online campaigns to disclose who they are or how they are funded. The opportunity for bad actors to manipulate election results is left wide open.
You may already know about our work to make public debate online more honest and transparent. Every day, we call out the most harmful misinformation on social media platforms when and where we see it. But right now, we’re urging the government to overhaul our election laws to make sure political campaigning is held to the same level of scrutiny online as it is offline.
This work all depends on the generosity of hundreds of people who all believe that for democracy to work, we need transparency. Our monthly donors help strengthen our voice, and show our politicians that this really matters. Would you consider joining them?
Become a donor today to make sure our elections are protected.