“Dimbleby: The leader of your campaign, Lord Rose, the former head of Marks and Spencer, gave evidence and said the price of labour will frankly go up if we leave the EU, so people will be better off if we leave the EU.
Cameron: That is, the overwhelming majority of experts –
Dimbleby: He’s your leader… I’m sorry why did he say this – is it not true?
Cameron: If you actually look at the full context of what he said it’s much more complicated.
Dimbleby: It’s not I have it here, I can read it to you… [Reads from script]
Moving on to the issue of immigration and the impact on wages very briefly, if free movement were to end following Brexit, is it not reasonable to suppose that we could see increases in wages for low-skilled workers in the UK, just off the back of the economic impact of free movement on wages?
Lord Rose: If you are short of labour, the price of labour will go up, so yes, but that is not necessarily a good thing.
Cameron: But then he goes on to say a whole load of other things…”
BBC Question Time, 20 June 2016 [38:20]
David Dimbleby has taken Stuart Rose’s claim out of context. He did not say that wages would necessarily go up and that people would be better off if we left the EU.
You can watch Stuart Rose’s answer to the Treasury Select Committee yourself, here, at timecode 16:01:34.
Stuart Rose conceded that if there are fewer workers available then businesses will be prepared to pay higher wages, according to mainstream economic theory.
“If you are short of labour, the price of labour will go up, so yes, but that is not necessarily a good thing.”
Lord Stuart Rose, 2 June 2016
He did not seem to predict that immigration would fall and UK wages would rise in the event of a vote to leave.
The integrity of our elections is in danger, and we need your help
You’re probably here looking for facts. Thank you for that trust. But with the EU parliament elections on the way and more elections a possibility, we need to act now to make sure our elections are protected, before it’s too late.
Could you help protect our elections by becoming a Full Fact donor?
Misinformation isn’t new, but advancements in technology mean it can spread at an unprecedented scale. Our dangerously outdated election laws have not kept up with the digital age, putting our next elections at risk of abuse.
Currently, it’s possible for a candidate to run a thousand different political ads to win the same seat, promising something different to each group it targets. At the same time, there’s no law requiring those who publish online campaigns to disclose who they are or how they are funded. The opportunity for bad actors to manipulate election results is left wide open.
You may already know about our work to make public debate online more honest and transparent. Every day, we call out the most harmful misinformation on social media platforms when and where we see it. But right now, we’re urging the government to overhaul our election laws to make sure political campaigning is held to the same level of scrutiny online as it is offline.
This work all depends on the generosity of hundreds of people who all believe that for democracy to work, we need transparency. Our monthly donors help strengthen our voice, and show our politicians that this really matters. Would you consider joining them?
Become a donor today to make sure our elections are protected.