£3bn cost of NHS reorganisation likely to be an overestimate

Published: 14th Mar 2014

It's been called 'modernisation', 'reorganisation' and even a 'major de-layering'. The government's changes to the way the NHS is structured - as set out by the Health and Social Care Act 2012 - is still being argued about on both sides of the fence.

Labour's Shadow Foreign Secretary, Douglas Alexander, revisited an old claim on yesterday's Question Time:

"There was an unwanted, unannounced top-down reorganisation of the NHS costing £3 billion, which has put in NHS in a weakened financial position which has meant that £1.4bn alone was spent on redundancy payments in the NHS"

We've factchecked this before, along with the government's counter-claim: that the structural changes have cost closer to £1.5 billion and are expected to save more than they cost.

The figures haven't changed, and neither have the problems associated with Labour's £3 billion cost. It represents the total funding which local trusts were required by previous NHS Operating Frameworks to set aside for 'non-recurrent' costs.

That can include the costs of transition to a new structure, but it doesn't preclude spending on other one-off projects as well, so it's an imprecise measure of transition costs.

Was this page useful to you? Yes No

We aim for our factchecks to be as accurate and up-to-date as possible. If you think we've made an error or missed some relevant information, please email team@fullfact.org.