- There were a record number of A&E attendances—almost 24 million—in England in 2017/18.
- 88% of people were seen within four hours of arriving. The target is for 95% to be seen within this time.
- Looking just at major A&E units, 82% were seen within four hours.
- Recent years have seen more targets missed and longer waiting times than previous years.
Record attendances and longer waits
There were 23.9 million attendances at A&E in England last year (2017/18)—a record number. That was over three million more than in 2009/10. 88% were seen within four hours of arriving in A&E, across all types of A&E. In major A&E departments (the largest, 24-hour consultant-led units) 82% of attendances were seen within four hours in 2017/18.
85% of patients were seen within four hours of arriving at A&E in January to March this year—a record low for such a period. Major A&E departments are further away from the target, although it applies to A&E departments as a whole. 77% were seen in four hours over this period, again a record low for this time of year.
People are also waiting longer on average. In 2017/18, a typical person spent anywhere from around 2 hours 24 minutes and up to 2 hours 40 minutes in A&E (this is the median duration from arrival to departure). Back in 2011 and 2012 this was closer to two hours.
Winter sees the longest waits and most targets missed
Waiting times are longer on average in winter. The same is broadly true for breaches of the waiting time targets, although these are now happening routinely throughout the year. The targets weren’t met at all in 2016 or in 2017.
In December 2017, 85% of attendances across all types of A&E were seen within four hours and 77% of attendances at major A&Es.
Major A&E departments have fallen below the standard for the majority of the past six years. The national targets are for all A&E units as a whole, not just major departments.
But fewer people attend A&E in the winter
Missed targets and longer waits can't be explained away by the volume of patients at A&E—winter is actually typically the quietest time of the year in terms of the number of patients attending. That said, in winter people are also more likely to need emergency treatment.
The Nuffield Trust has also cautioned about an "undue focus" in public debate on the four hour target, which it says can distort behaviour in hospitals and detract from the interests of patients or staff.
'Waiting times' aren't all about waiting
A 'waiting time' according to the targets is the time it takes after someone arrives in A&E for them to be either admitted to hospital, transferred to another healthcare provider (maybe to social services or to another hospital) or discharged. It represents the total time someone spends in an A&E department.
That doesn't mean people wait for that whole time. A&E departments treat people during their stay—like dressing wounds, giving out medication, or simply offering advice. This takes time, and it's not time spent in a waiting room.
A typical patient waited an hour to be treated from when they arrived at A&E in March this year (the most recent statistics available). That compares to a total median time in A&E of about two hours and forty minutes. That doesn't mean treatment usually lasts over an hour: this time could involve further waiting (for test results or so staff can monitor a patient).
So we don't know exactly how long people wait, but 'waiting times' often include the time it takes to receive treatment as well.
About four in 10 patients are discharged without follow-up
Being discharged without any follow-up is the most common way people leave A&E. 39% of A&E attendances leave A&E this way. This doesn't mean those people weren't treated during their stay in A&E and doesn't necessarily mean they went to A&E wrongly.
- Statistics on A&E in Scotland
- Statistics on A&E in Wales
- Statistics on A&E in Northern Ireland
- Briefing note on A&E statistics from House of Commons Library
- Briefing note on A&E performance from House of Commons Library
The integrity of our elections is in danger, and we need your help
You’re probably here looking for facts. Thank you for that trust. But with the EU parliament elections on the way and more elections a possibility, we need to act now to make sure our elections are protected, before it’s too late.
Could you help protect our elections by becoming a Full Fact donor?
Misinformation isn’t new, but advancements in technology mean it can spread at an unprecedented scale. Our dangerously outdated election laws have not kept up with the digital age, putting our next elections at risk of abuse.
Currently, it’s possible for a candidate to run a thousand different political ads to win the same seat, promising something different to each group it targets. At the same time, there’s no law requiring those who publish online campaigns to disclose who they are or how they are funded. The opportunity for bad actors to manipulate election results is left wide open.
You may already know about our work to make public debate online more honest and transparent. Every day, we call out the most harmful misinformation on social media platforms when and where we see it. But right now, we’re urging the government to overhaul our election laws to make sure political campaigning is held to the same level of scrutiny online as it is offline.
This work all depends on the generosity of hundreds of people who all believe that for democracy to work, we need transparency. Our monthly donors help strengthen our voice, and show our politicians that this really matters. Would you consider joining them?
Become a donor today to make sure our elections are protected.