But it's not true. Researchers studied people who had psychotic disorders in South London, and found that 24% of these cases were linked to use of a more potent type of cannabis (often called 'skunk'). But the use of skunk, and consequently psychotic disorders, is more common in South London than elsewhere in the UK.
So the figure isn't representative of the rest of the UK, as the researchers pointed out in their paper. While this was made clearer in the body of the Telegraph and Mirror articles, that doesn't justify the misleading headlines. We're asking for these to be corrected.
Why population matters—an example
Imagine a study that looks at broken legs in an alpine town. Half the people in the town ski regularly, and the other don't.
For the sake of argument let's say people who ski are far more likely to break a leg or two. So much so that 90% of broken legs in our fictional town are a result of skiing accidents.
The study would tell you a lot about the relative riskiness of skiing in the alps compared to not doing so, and could make interesting reading for anyone who's considering a holiday to that particular resort.
But it'd be ludicrous to suggest that 90% of all broken legs are a result of skiing accidents. That figure is specific to the people under study because the way they behave (particularly their skiing habits) isn't typical.
That's what we're doing when we take the proportion of cases in South London that are cannabis-related and apply it to everyone in the UK.
The research found that smoking skunk—but not hash—is associated with an increased risk of psychosis
The research found that compared to people who'd never used cannabis, skunk users were at three times the risk of developing a psychotic disorder. If they smoked it every day they were at five times the risk.
Users of hash, a less potent form of cannabis, were found to be at no higher risk of psychotic disorders than non-users, irrespective of how often they smoked it.
Update 26/02/2015 Part of this article originally said the research found skunk use increased the risk of psychosis, when in fact it was found to be associated with an increased risk of psychosis.
We can’t sugar coat how difficult this year has been for good information.
News this year has fractured communities, and caused confusion and panic for many of us. No one can control what will happen next. But you can support a debate based on fair, accurate and transparent information.
As independent, impartial fact checkers, we rely on individuals like you to ensure the most dangerously false inaccuracies can be called out and challenged.
Could you chip in to support an accurate and fair debate today?