Report of 8% vaccine efficacy for elderly is unreliable
26 January 2021
What was claimed
The German federal government only expects the AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine to have an effectiveness of eight percent among the over 65s.
The German government said it couldn’t confirm the report. Public data shows older adults had a similar immune response to the vaccine as younger adults, though there is limited data for over 65s.
“According to information from Handelsblatt from coalition circles, the federal government only expects an effectiveness of eight percent among the over 65s.”
The German federal government has responded to a claim in the German newspaper Handelsblatt that suggested the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine was 8% effective among over 65s.
Handelsblatt attributed this information to the federal government. However, the German Federal Ministry of Health told Full Fact it “cannot confirm recent reports of reduced efficacy of the AstraZeneca vaccine”, adding:
“At first glance, it seems that two things have been confused in the reports: About 8% of the subjects in the AstraZeneca efficacy trial were between 56 and 69 years of age, and only 3 to 4 percent were over 70 years of age.
“However, this does not imply an efficacy of only 8% in the elderly.”
After this article was first published, Handelsblattpublished a paper from Germany’s federal disease control agency, the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), including its calculations on the vaccine’s efficacy data submitted by the manufacturers. These appeared to show the vaccine was just 6.3% effective among over 65s.
This is close to 8%. However this number shouldn’t be taken at face value.
Vaccine efficacy is calculated by comparing the number of vaccinated people who catch the disease to the number of unvaccinated people who catch the disease.
Because you might not expect many people to become exposed to and catch the disease, even among the unvaccinated group, you need a large number of trial participants to accurately observe any effect.
But, in this case, there were only 660 over 65s in the trial, roughly half of whom were vaccinated and half of whom were not.
There was only one infection in each group.
With sample sizes this small, the margin of error around that 6.3% figure was huge, from the vaccine being 94% effective among over 65s to 1405% ineffective.
By comparison, the RKI deemed the efficacy among all people in the trial to be between 54.8% and 80.6% with 70.4% as the central estimate.
Subsequently Germany’s vaccination committee only recommended the vaccine for under 65s, saying: “There is not yet sufficient data available to evaluate the vaccine efficacy for the age of 65 years and older.”
Prof Stephen Evans, Professor of Pharmacoepidemiology at London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, said: “The randomised data on immunogenicity does not suggest that there will be notably lower efficacy at older ages for the Oxford/ AstraZeneca vaccine.” However, he noted that efficacy data for older adults is more limited as older adults were recruited into trials later.
Update 16 February 2021
This article was updated following the publication of new information from the German government.
You’ve probably seen a surge in misleading and unsubstantiated medical advice since the Covid-19 outbreak. If followed, it can put lives at serious risk. We need your help to protect us all from false and harmful information.
We’ve seen people claiming to be health professionals, family members, and even the government – offering dangerous tips like drinking warm water or gargling to prevent infection. Neither of these will work.
The longer claims like these go unchecked, the more they are repeated and believed. It can put people’s health at serious risk, when our services are already under pressure.
Today, you have the opportunity to help save lives. Good information about Covid-19 could be the difference between someone taking the right precautions to protect themselves and their families, or not. Could you help protect us all from false and harmful information today?