Health tourism costs 0.3% of NHS spending.
The government’s estimate of how much "deliberate health tourism" and those taking advantage of free NHS services cost the NHS every year was around 0.3% of NHS spending allocated to specific services in 2012/13. It’s still roughly around 0.3% of total health spending.
“So-called 'health tourism' costs just 0.3% of NHS spending”.
Mirror, 23 November 2016
It’s difficult to put a figure on exactly how much “health tourism” costs the NHS. 0.3% reflects the upper end of the government’s rough estimates of “deliberate health tourism” and visitors “taking advantage” of the system.
Who is a “health tourist”?
Qualifying for free NHS care isn’t based on nationality or where someone was born. It’s based on whether you are “ordinarily resident” in the UK and the type of treatment you need.
The government estimates that normal use of the NHS, by people who aren’t “ordinarily resident”, but who don’t come to the UK specifically to use the NHS, is around £1.8 billion a year. This can include holiday makers who injure themselves while in the UK or someone who gets sick while in the UK for work temporarily.
When it made this estimate in 2012/13 the government said it thought that about £190 million of this figure could be charged directly to patients and another £220 million charged to European Economic Area (EEA) countries under the European Health Insurance Card scheme.
Deliberate health tourism means those who come to the UK deliberately to use NHS services they’re not entitled to for free. Those taking advantage of the system are those who frequently come to the UK and are able to use GP services and other treatments like prescriptions. This could even include British expats who return to the UK to see a trusted doctor.
It is this group the Mirror refers to when it says that health tourism costs 0.3% of NHS spending.
What does it cost?
At the moment there are some services which, no matter whether you are “ordinarily resident” or not, you can’t be charged for. The costs estimated by the government also include these services, like going to see a GP or using Accident and Emergency. So even if the NHS charged for all the services it possibly could and received the money, it wouldn’t cover the full amount health tourism is estimated to cost.
So how does that compare to overall NHS spending?
The Mirror compared the upper estimate of £300 million spent on deliberate health tourism and those taking advantage to the £91.5 billion allocated to specific NHS services in 2012/13. That’s just over 0.3%.
There hasn’t been a thorough analysis of the costs of health tourism more recently so we can’t say whether or not this proportion spent on deliberate health tourism has changed.
Looking at this another way, the upper estimate for the cost of deliberate health tourism would be around £311 million in 2015/16 prices. Assuming this figure is still roughly the same then that would have been around 0.31% of the total NHS budget for that year and 0.27% of the Department of Health’s total budget.
This isn’t a particularly accurate measure—we’ve just used GDP growth as a basis for inflation here— but it gives a rough idea of the cost of “deliberate health tourism” and services used by those “taking advantage”.
What can be recovered?
The government aims to recover £500 million a year by 2017/18 from all patients not eligible for free treatment on the NHS. In 2015/16 it charged £289 million, although we don’t know how much of this it received. It has also predicted that it won’t meet the 2017/18 aim and will charge £346 million that year.
From April 2015, non-EEA citizens who come to the UK for longer than six months as students or temporary migrants have been required to pay a “health surcharge” as part of their visa process. This allows them to access NHS care free of charge during their stay in the UK. Most of the increase in NHS charging in 2015/16 came from this.
We’ve written about the costs of health tourism before.
The integrity of our elections is in danger, and we need your help
You’re probably here looking for facts. Thank you for that trust. But with the EU parliament elections on the way and more elections a possibility, we need to act now to make sure our elections are protected, before it’s too late.
Could you help protect our elections by becoming a Full Fact donor?
Misinformation isn’t new, but advancements in technology mean it can spread at an unprecedented scale. Our dangerously outdated election laws have not kept up with the digital age, putting our next elections at risk of abuse.
Currently, it’s possible for a candidate to run a thousand different political ads to win the same seat, promising something different to each group it targets. At the same time, there’s no law requiring those who publish online campaigns to disclose who they are or how they are funded. The opportunity for bad actors to manipulate election results is left wide open.
You may already know about our work to make public debate online more honest and transparent. Every day, we call out the most harmful misinformation on social media platforms when and where we see it. But right now, we’re urging the government to overhaul our election laws to make sure political campaigning is held to the same level of scrutiny online as it is offline.
This work all depends on the generosity of hundreds of people who all believe that for democracy to work, we need transparency. Our monthly donors help strengthen our voice, and show our politicians that this really matters. Would you consider joining them?
Become a donor today to make sure our elections are protected.