Nearly two-thirds of ‘child’ refugees who officials questioned about their real age were found to be adults.
The Home Office has decided in two thirds of ‘age disputes’ that the asylum seeker involved was over 18. But there’s no definitive test for age, and this fact isn’t necessarily relevant to young people who have already been screened for age in Calais.
“Nearly two-thirds of ‘child’ refugees who officials questioned about their real age were found to be adults, Home Office documents show.”
Daily Telegraph, 18 October 2016
These figures are correct. But they relate to the normal asylum process, and it’s not necessarily fair to compare this to the situation of asylum seekers being brought over from Calais.
These young people have had some initial screening before arriving, so may be less likely to be deemed over 18 later. Asylum seekers going through the normal asylum process don’t undergo prior age checks before they make an application.
Two thirds of age disputes go against the asylum seeker
Children are treated differently in the asylum system, so there are incentives for people to try to ensure—rightly or wrongly—that they are treated as such by the Home Office.
In the 12 months to June 2016, 933 age disputes were resolved by the Home Office. It decided that 636, or 68%, of those involved were actually 18 or older.
This isn't 68% of all asylum seekers who claimed to be a child. It's just those cases where an age dispute was raised.
But there’s no precise test for whether someone is over or under 18.
No fool-proof way of assessing age
Advice for doctors from the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health says that “In practice, age determination is extremely difficult to do with certainty, and no single approach to this is [sic] can be relied on... Age determination is an inexact science and the margin of error can sometimes be as much as 5 years either side”.
As has been widely reported, dental tests also come with a margin of error. They are “accurate to within + or - 2 years for 95% of the population”.
So the authorities generally rely on interviews and other non-physical checks to try to work out age.
A spokesperson for Asylum Aid told the BBC yesterday that asylum seekers arriving in the UK “go through long interviews… questioned and undergo psychological tests for hours sometimes”.
Age assessments under the normal asylum process
Home Office guidance says that where there is doubt over their age, asylum seekers should be initially treated as an adult “if their physical appearance / demeanour very strongly suggests that they are significantly over 18 years of age”. Otherwise, they get the benefit of the doubt initially.
But that’s not the end of the matter. Instead, “further evidence will be collected, including the view of the local authority to which the individuals should be referred”, as Coram Children’s Legal Centre puts it. The Home Office will give “considerable weight” to the local authority’s findings, saying that “it is likely that in most cases that authority’s decision will be decisive”.
Local authorities carry out their assessment following guidance from the courts, including a 2003 decision involving the London Borough of Merton. So the assessment is often referred to as the “Merton test”.
It’s not clear if all checks that would be carried out in the UK are done in Calais
The Home Office told us that the asylum seekers recently brought over from Calais will have been interviewed by UK officials, who take into account documentary evidence, physical appearance/demeanour and any Merton test.
The Home Secretary said on 25 October that social workers were carrying out age assessments "on the ground".
However, the Mail reports charity workers as saying that “the Home Office does not begin rigorous verification of their claimed ages until after they arrive in Britain… until then, UK officials largely rely on checks made by charities working in the Jungle”. And the Home Office statement also says that “once in the UK there is also the option of requesting a further [Merton test]”, which suggests that checks in France aren’t exhaustive.
We’ve asked the charity Citizens UK for more information.
Any checks that have been done in Calais will affect the likelihood of an asylum seeker being judged over 18 once in the UK. It doesn’t seem likely that two thirds of a group selected on the basis of their age, so far as this can be tested, will then turn out to be over 18.
The integrity of our elections is in danger, and we need your help
You’re probably here looking for facts. Thank you for that trust. But with the EU parliament elections on the way and more elections a possibility, we need to act now to make sure our elections are protected, before it’s too late.
Could you help protect our elections by becoming a Full Fact donor?
Misinformation isn’t new, but advancements in technology mean it can spread at an unprecedented scale. Our dangerously outdated election laws have not kept up with the digital age, putting our next elections at risk of abuse.
Currently, it’s possible for a candidate to run a thousand different political ads to win the same seat, promising something different to each group it targets. At the same time, there’s no law requiring those who publish online campaigns to disclose who they are or how they are funded. The opportunity for bad actors to manipulate election results is left wide open.
You may already know about our work to make public debate online more honest and transparent. Every day, we call out the most harmful misinformation on social media platforms when and where we see it. But right now, we’re urging the government to overhaul our election laws to make sure political campaigning is held to the same level of scrutiny online as it is offline.
This work all depends on the generosity of hundreds of people who all believe that for democracy to work, we need transparency. Our monthly donors help strengthen our voice, and show our politicians that this really matters. Would you consider joining them?
Become a donor today to make sure our elections are protected.