A couple of weeks ago, we pointed out that the law on "holiday fines" hasn't changed, despite widespread reporting of a "landmark legal battle" by a parent faced with prosecution for taking his daughter out of school in term time.
Jon Platt successfully argued in court that he wasn't guilty of "failure to secure regular attendance at school", despite this holiday.
We noted that the outcome of that case actually has no formal repercussions. It was in the magistrates' court, the lowest rung on the ladder—magistrates can't set legal precedents that would have to be followed in other cases.
The Council says that "the recent media attention given to this case shows that there is interest, concern and, above all, uncertainty as to what constitutes 'regular attendance' for the purposes of the legislation in question".
Official guidance states that parents can be issued with fines in situations including "holidays taken during term time without the school's permission". But that's only as an alternative to prosecution for irregular attendance—it's not clear that the guidance is correct that fines can be given when attendance is generally regular. The High Court will be asked to decide on this.
In the meantime, the Council is sticking to the guidance—so nothing changes for parents unless and until the High Court declares that it's wrong.
Politicians shouldn’t get away with misleading us—can you help?
As the UK’s independent factchecking charity, Full Fact relies on our supporters’ generosity to hold public figures to account and push for higher standards of debate.
But with a new prime minister on the way, and the possibility of a general election, we need your help more than ever to ensure that everyone can get the facts they need, on the issues that matter most.