Around a dozen other European countries have banned zero hours contracts.
Not all have an explicit ban, but it’s correct that most EU countries outlaw these contracts, heavily restrict them, or don’t see them widely used. The UK is one of around half a dozen European countries where zero hours contracts are both legal and fairly common.
“In her speech on the steps of Downing Street, [Theresa May] also addressed insecure workers, saying ‘you have a job but that doesn’t always mean you have job security’. Does that mean that she’s proposing to... ban zero hours contracts as more than a dozen European nations have already done?”
Jeremy Corbyn, 20 July 2016
“Zero hours contracts are not allowed in Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Netherlands, Poland and Spain. It seems we’re the odd one out.”
Jeremy Corbyn, 16 June 2016
Under a zero hours contract workers aren’t guaranteed work. Instead, they are offered hours as and when the employer needs them. In general the employer doesn’t have to offer any hours, and the employee doesn’t have to accept the work offered.
Zero hours contracts are controversial in the UK. It’s fair to say that in many other European countries, such contracts are unknown, heavily regulated or banned (either deliberately or in practice).
The list of countries given by Mr Corbyn in his 16 June speech is almost exactly the same as that given in a 2014 blog post on a law firm’s website, and this is where Labour referred us when we enquired about the source.
The party said that in addition to the countries listed there, the “Netherlands and others have since banned them”.
The blog post doesn’t contain any references, and the firm hasn’t responded to our request for more information.
But we also asked employment law experts from around Europe, and consulted some academic studies. Here’s what they said.This table hides considerable complexity. It’s hard to work out what the exact equivalent to a zero hours contract is in different countries.
‘On call’ work, for instance, might describe a similar situation—as in Italy. But it might also be more like doctors being on call on top of regular hours, as researchers from the University of Limerick point out.
They also identify several other reasons why the exercise is fraught with “significant difficulty” and highlight the need for “a more comprehensive comparative review”.
That means that putting labels on different forms of employment is tricky.
In Germany, for instance, Professor Bernd Waas writes that “employers and employees may agree that the employee performs work according to the actual needs of the business”, but “if the employer calls the employee for less than three consecutive hours, the employee can claim pay for three hours of work”.
In our table, we’ve followed the University of Limerick study in classifying this as similar to a zero hours situation, but arguably the restrictions mean that it’s not really like the situation in the UK.
In some cases, zero hours contacts are used so rarely that the government hasn’t needed to take action.
Professor Iván Rodríguez Cardo of the University of Oviedo told us that in Spain, such contracts aren’t expressly prohibited because employers don’t consider using them in the first place.
But overall, it’s clear that Mr Corbyn has a point that bans or restrictions on zero hours employment are widespread in continental Europe.
Is the UK the “odd one out”? Not as such.
But only in Scandinavia and former British colonies (Ireland, Malta, Cyprus) are zero hours contracts a standard feature of the employment landscape.
We need facts more than ever.
Right now, it’s difficult to know what or who to trust. Misinformation is spreading. Politics and the media are being pushed to the limit by advancements in technology and uncertainty about the future. We need facts more than ever.
This is where you come in. Your donation is vital for our small, independent team to keep going, at the time when it’s needed most. With your help, we can keep factchecking and demanding better from our politicians and public figures.We can give more people the tools to decide for themselves what to believe. We can intervene more effectively where false claims cause most harm.
Become a donor today and stand up for better public debate, on all sides, across the UK.