The proportion of BAME young offenders in custody rose from 25% to 41% between 2006 and 2016.
Correct for England and Wales.
The number of young offenders has fallen to a record low.
That’s correct for England and Wales.
Claim 1 of 2
“Despite the overall number of young offenders falling to record lows, the proportion of BAME young offenders in custody rose from 25% to 41% between 2006 and 2016.”
Huff Post, 8 September 2017
It’s correct that the number of young offenders in England and Wales is at a record low, as is the number of young offenders detained in the “secure youth estate”. This includes young offender institutions, secure children’s homes and secure training centres.
It’s also correct that there is an increasing proportion of BAME young offenders in the secure estate. The number of Black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) young offenders in the secure youth estate is decreasing, but not as quickly as the number of white young offenders.
Young offender numbers at a record low
The number of young people given any type of sentence in court has been falling. It was just under 97,000 in 2005/06 compared to fewer than 28,000 in 2015/16.
Only about 6% are given a custodial sentence in any given year.
The number of young offenders sentenced to custody in the “secure youth estate” has also been falling.
On average there were 959 under 18s in the secure youth estate in any given month in 2015/16, down from 2,832 across 2005/06. Provisional figures suggest that it continued to decrease in 2016/17, and then will increase slightly to 921 in 2017/18.
We’re looking into the reasons behind this fall in numbers. The Lammy Review says that Youth Offending Teams have been largely successful in reducing youth offending and reoffending.
In 2015/16 the most common primary offences of young people in custody were ‘violence against the person’ (34% of young offenders in custody) and robbery (25%).
Despite the overall fall, the numbers being held in custody for some types of offences is increasing; namely drug offences and sexual and violent offences.
A higher proportion of young offenders in custody are BAME
It’s correct that the proportion of young BAME offenders in the secure youth estate is increasing. It went from 25% of the population in custody in 2005/06 to 41% in 2015/16.
That doesn’t mean the number of BAME young offenders in custody has increased – over the ten years it went from 701 down to 398. But the number of BAME young offenders in the secure youth estate hasn’t decreased as quickly as the number of young white offenders has.
The review by David Lammy concluded that there was no single reason for the overrepresentation of people from BAME backgrounds (both young and old) in the criminal justice system.
It said that BAME people were more likely to be arrested, but that this didn’t fully explain their over-representation in the secure estate. They were also more likely to plead not guilty in court (the review found that when someone pleaded guilty they were more likely to receive a shorter sentence or a community sentence).
The review also looked into the severity of sentences given to BAME people. It found that they were more likely than white defendants to receive a prison sentence for drug offences at the Crown Court in 2015, even once past convictions were taken into account. But it wasn’t able to find an “evidence-based explanation” for this happening.
We’ve looked more into this here.
Different stages in the criminal justice system
The proportion of young BAME people varies at different points in the criminal justice system.
Roughly 18% of 10 to 17 year olds identified as BAME at the time of the 2011 census. In comparison 25% of 10 to 17 year olds arrested for a crime in 2015/16 were BAME and 41% of those in the secure youth estate.
The integrity of our elections is in danger, and we need your help
You’re probably here looking for facts. Thank you for that trust. But with the EU parliament elections on the way and more elections a possibility, we need to act now to make sure our elections are protected, before it’s too late.
Could you help protect our elections by becoming a Full Fact donor?
Misinformation isn’t new, but advancements in technology mean it can spread at an unprecedented scale. Our dangerously outdated election laws have not kept up with the digital age, putting our next elections at risk of abuse.
Currently, it’s possible for a candidate to run a thousand different political ads to win the same seat, promising something different to each group it targets. At the same time, there’s no law requiring those who publish online campaigns to disclose who they are or how they are funded. The opportunity for bad actors to manipulate election results is left wide open.
You may already know about our work to make public debate online more honest and transparent. Every day, we call out the most harmful misinformation on social media platforms when and where we see it. But right now, we’re urging the government to overhaul our election laws to make sure political campaigning is held to the same level of scrutiny online as it is offline.
This work all depends on the generosity of hundreds of people who all believe that for democracy to work, we need transparency. Our monthly donors help strengthen our voice, and show our politicians that this really matters. Would you consider joining them?
Become a donor today to make sure our elections are protected.