"Labour yesterday admitted it will borrow billions more than the Tories—as experts warned the party's plans would leave a £30 billion black hole at the heart of the nation's finances."
—The Daily Mail, 30th March 2015
It seems hard to reconcile this Daily Mail leader with the Labour Party's own press releases.
"We will balance the books: getting the current budget into surplus and national debt falling as soon as possible within the next Parliament."
One gives a £30 billion "black hole", the other a surplus and falling debt. But both of these statements are completely consistent with each other.
Labour have pledged a surplus on the current budget—which means that government revenue should cover day-to-day spending on things other than investment on things like buildings and roads.
Spending on investment over the next parliament is estimated to be about £30 billion each year. So if the current budget surplus is small and no cuts are made to investment spending, the deficit will be around £30 billion each year.
How does this fit in with falling debt? Labour's target is actually to have debt falling as a proportion of GDP. We're already forecast to have net debt as a proportion of GDP falling in 2015/16 despite the government running an overall deficit. This is a temporary reduction because the government is selling assets.
If the economy grows fast enough, then debt as a share of GDP can fall without asset sales, and while the government is running a deficit.
Labour are committing to a lower reduction in the deficit than the Conservatives. This means that while they've committed to cuts in 2015/16, they can cut less—or tax less—over the rest of the next parliament.
The rationale behind Labour's target is simple: borrowing to invest isn't the same as borrowing to spend. Good investments in infrastructure can lead to a stronger economy tomorrow. This does come at a cost. Higher debt means that the government spends more on interest payments in the future, and has less room to borrow in bad times.
Full Fact wants to see greater accountability for public figures who mislead us—and we need your help.
Political debate in the UK is in flux right now. The UK’s exit from the European Union is approaching, we will soon have a new prime minister and potentially a general election.
We want politicians to tell the truth, and while the best politicians realise that their work should be done honestly, some aren't taking their responsibilities seriously. Both sides in the EU referendum campaign let voters down, from deceptively designed leaflets to some of the arguments made on each side. The public rightly expects more from politicians.
We want to see greater accountability for public figures who mislead. Full Fact will continue to advocate for higher standards and call out those who don't uphold them.
But we rely on the generosity of our supporters to make sure we can spot the most harmful misinformation when we most need to.
Can you help us?
Support better public debate today.