- Housebuilding has not been keeping up with the rate of demand for a long time.
- Latest figures show that the rate of house building over time and number of houses built per year in the UK has been falling since the 1980s, while the population has increased.
- Under successive governments social home building either by Housing Associations or Local Authorities has slowed and waiting lists have remained high.
- Some social housing stock is deemed 'non-decent' by the government, meaning it's in poor condition, poorly insulated, has outdated facilities or fails to meet legal minimum standards. The proportion of social housing stock that was judged to be 'non-decent' has been falling over the last few years; in England in 2012 the proportion was 15.2%.
- This pressure on housing is going to get more pronounced as demand is predicted to get higher every year. England is predicted to have 220,000 extra households per year between 2012 and 2022.
- The supply of new housing has fallen far short of that figure—119,000 homes were built in England in 2014.
- The matter of young people not being able to raise a deposit to buy their first house, and the cost of private sector renting are both issues in this election and each major party has pledges towards addressing these problems in their manifestos. We have a briefing providing context to these debates:
- UK house prices have more than trebled in the past 20 years
- Fewer under-25s are buying homes, while houses are more expensive for first-time buyers relative to their incomes
- Social housing waiting lists have risen, and rents are becoming more expensive
- Housebuilding is at its lowest peacetime position since the 1920s in England and Wales
- The UK still compares well internationally on overcrowding and unaffordability.
- In 1983, the average UK home cost for a first-time buyer (or buyers in the case of joint mortgages) was the equivalent of 2.7 times their total annual earnings. In 2015 this had risen to 5 times their income.
- In London the problem is particularly pronounced, as the ratio has increased from 3.7 to 9 times average incomes.
"Housebuilding is at its lowest peacetime rate since the 1920s."
The Conservative manifesto says this was the case under the last Labour government and Labour have criticised the coalition government because the low housebuilding rate has continued. It is important that the claim mentions 'peacetime' housebuilding, because during the second war housebuilding plummeted. We have factchecked this claim and produced a graph on the rate of housing building since the 1920s.
"Home ownership is now at its lowest level in 30 years"— Ed Miliband
Owner occupation in England currently accounts for 63% of all households, down from a peak at 71% in 2003. Private renters make up 19% of households, and those in the social rented sector account for the remaining 17%.
But the number buying with a mortgage has been in constant decline since the mid-2000s, and are now at levels last seen in the 1980s; the number of outright owners is rising. We have previously covered possible reasons for the decline, including rising house prices and the disparity between prices and the average buyer's earnings.
Read more on the economy:
- Election 2015: the economy
- Election 2015: the debt and deficit
- Election 2015: tax and the cost of living
- Election 2015: jobs
The integrity of our elections is in danger, and we need your help
You’re probably here looking for facts. Thank you for that trust. But with the EU parliament elections on the way and more elections a possibility, we need to act now to make sure our elections are protected, before it’s too late.
Could you help protect our elections by becoming a Full Fact donor?
Misinformation isn’t new, but advancements in technology mean it can spread at an unprecedented scale. Our dangerously outdated election laws have not kept up with the digital age, putting our next elections at risk of abuse.
Currently, it’s possible for a candidate to run a thousand different political ads to win the same seat, promising something different to each group it targets. At the same time, there’s no law requiring those who publish online campaigns to disclose who they are or how they are funded. The opportunity for bad actors to manipulate election results is left wide open.
You may already know about our work to make public debate online more honest and transparent. Every day, we call out the most harmful misinformation on social media platforms when and where we see it. But right now, we’re urging the government to overhaul our election laws to make sure political campaigning is held to the same level of scrutiny online as it is offline.
This work all depends on the generosity of hundreds of people who all believe that for democracy to work, we need transparency. Our monthly donors help strengthen our voice, and show our politicians that this really matters. Would you consider joining them?
Become a donor today to make sure our elections are protected.