2015 is well and truly underway—and so is a lengthy general election campaign it would seem. With four months still to go until the polls open, the parties are already vying for our votes with claims, counter-claims—and posters.
On the road again
In their first campaign poster of the new year, the Conservatives offer up a vision of verdant fields and a well-maintained road stretching into a sunlit horizon—although according to some sources quite possibly a well-maintained German road.
We haven't researched the picture's origin, but we have taken a look at the claims.
"1.75 million more people in work"
That's right. Total employment has increased substantially since the election, from about 29 million people in February-April 2010 to around 30.8 million people in August-October 2014. The Conservatives are counting from before the party was actually elected, and the size of the increase depends on the period chosen.
About 1.3 million workers in this increase were in full-time employment.
But the population has grown too. There were around 1.3 million more people in the UK in midyear 2013 than there were in midyear 2010.
The employment rate takes out the effects of changes in the population on employment.
This has still increased— about 73% of people aged between 16 and 64 were employed in July-September 2014—up from around 70% at the election.
However, this should be viewed in context: the employment rate would be expected to rise after a recession.
"760,000 more businesses"
That's right too. The government have used the Business Population Estimates produced by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, which show that from the start of 2010 to the start of 2014, the number of private sector businesses in the UK increased by 760,000.
But the BIS figures include a 707,000 increase in businesses that have no employees—mainly self-employed workers.
"The Deficit Halved"
The difference between the deficit and government debt can be confusing. While the debt is the amount of government borrowing that has not yet been paid off, the deficit is the difference between government income and spending within a year.
While the deficit has been cut substantially, it's not been halved in absolute terms.
Instead of talking in absolute terms, the Conservatives are discussing the budget deficit as a proportion of GDP. By this measure, the deficit has halved. In absolute terms, it's been cut by about a third.
When we talk about the deficit it's important that we know which measure is being referred to. While the ratio of the deficit to GDP is useful in predicting the effect of the deficit on the economy or how affordable government borrowing is, the headline measure of the deficit is its absolute value.
Labour has adapted a previous Conservative campaign poster to attack their opponents, claiming they would cut spending on public services to the levels of the 1930s.
Before the National Health Service
The Conservatives don't plan to cut public spending to the level of the 1930s—at least not in absolute terms.
Labour is using a figure for spending as a proportion of GDP to make this point. The party press office confirmed this and source the Office for Budgetary Responsibility report on the Autumn Statement.
In absolute terms, planned spending by the Conservatives would still be higher than in 2007-08.
The OBR data only goes back to 1948 for total government spending as a proportion of GDP, and to 1955-56 in real terms. However, IFS analysis of historical General Government Expenditure (a narrower definition) indicates that under Conservative plans spending as a proportion of GDP would be at it's lowest level since the 1930s.
Full Fact wants to see greater accountability for public figures who mislead us—and we need your help.
Political debate in the UK is in flux right now. The UK’s exit from the European Union is approaching, we will soon have a new prime minister and potentially a general election.
We want politicians to tell the truth, and while the best politicians realise that their work should be done honestly, some aren't taking their responsibilities seriously. Both sides in the EU referendum campaign let voters down, from deceptively designed leaflets to some of the arguments made on each side. The public rightly expects more from politicians.
We want to see greater accountability for public figures who mislead. Full Fact will continue to advocate for higher standards and call out those who don't uphold them.
But we rely on the generosity of our supporters to make sure we can spot the most harmful misinformation when we most need to.
Can you help us?
Support better public debate today.