There are now 1.9 million more children in good or outstanding schools compared with 2010.
This doesn’t acknowledge that there were 560,000 more pupils in state-funded schools in England in 2017 compared to 2010, and changes to inspection practices. 580,000 pupils are in schools that haven’t been inspected since 2010.
“1.9 million more children are in good and outstanding schools as a result of what I did.”
Michael Gove MP, 9 June 2019
“Now we have 1.9 million more children in good and outstanding schools as a result of Conservative reforms.”
Michael Gove MP, 10 June 2019
On the Andrew Marr Show, and then the following day at the campaign launch for his bid to become Conservative party leader, former education secretary Michael Gove repeated a claim that we’ve seen a lot of: that there are now 1.9 million more children in schools rated as “good” or “outstanding” compared to 2010 when the Coalition government came to power.
This claim is technically accurate but misleading, because it ignores some important context: it doesn’t factor in the fact that pupil numbers have risen, and inspection practices have changed. Attributing the rise to government policy alone is wrong.
We’ve written about this before. We’ve said the government should stop using this figure. Then we said it again, and again, and again. We’re not alone: last year, in a letter about “serious concerns” with the Department for Education’s use of statistics, the UK Statistics Authority said that this claim “does not give a full picture”.
Below is what we wrote in October last year, explaining in more detail why this figure is misleading (the number has actually decreased very slightly since we wrote this, but still rounds to 1.9 million.)
From 11th October 2018:
Pupil numbers are going up
“Good” and “outstanding” are the two highest ratings schools can be given by Ofsted (the schools inspector in England). Schools that don’t meet this standard are rated as “requiring improvement” or “inadequate”.
There were 1.9 million more pupils in state-funded primary schools rated “good” or “outstanding” in England in August 2017, compared to August 2010.
But this isn’t all down to improving standards in schools. The number of pupils in state-funded schools increased by 560,000 (7%) between 2010 and 2017—so the sheer increase in number of pupils will contribute significantly to the number of pupils in good or outstanding schools.
The Education Policy Institute argues that pupils who started school after 2010 are more likely to have chosen a school if it was rated good or outstanding. It estimates that 578,000 of the 1.9 million increase is down to a combination of increasing pupil numbers, and pupil choices about which school to attend.
Changes to inspection practices may overstate the increase
A more meaningful comparison is to look at the percentage of pupils in good or outstanding schools. This still shows a rise: 66% of pupils were in good or outstanding schools in August 2010, compared to 88% in August 2017.
“579,000 pupils attend schools that are rated as good or outstanding but have not been inspected since at least 2010” according to the Education Policy Institute. Overall, there were around eight million pupils in state-funded schools in England in 2017.
This effect is driven by a government policy where outstanding schools don’t haveto be re-inspected unless there is a significant drop in exam results, while schools rated below good or outstanding are prioritised for re-inspection.
A National Audit Office report from 2018 said: “The older an inspection judgement, the greater the risk that it is no longer accurate.”
It added: “exempting outstanding schools from routine re-inspection reduces the extent to which Ofsted’s inspectors see outstanding schools, and therefore the extent to which they can compare with and reference outstanding practice.”
Moreover, changing inspection practices in 2012 are likely to have contributed to an increased number of schools being rated good or outstanding.
In 2012, the government changed the rating “satisfactory” (the one below “good”) to “requires improvement”, and “good” became the minimum expected standard for schools.
The Education Policy Institute notes that this change in ratings was followed by a step change in the number of primary schools (but not secondaries) improving at inspection in the following year (rising from 48% to 57%). It theorises that inspectors were less likely to give the new “requires improvement” rating, as it was more punitive for schools.
It accepts that the point above is not a “full analysis of the issue”. However, it underlines the level of uncertainty around what is driving the increasing number of pupils in good or outstanding schools.
Can you help protect this election from the influence of bad information? Support Full Fact
This election, clear, accurate facts won’t always be a guarantee. False and harmful claims are spread every day by our public figures and media. Intentional or not, they have the power to shape the choices we make. We all deserve better than that.
That’s why we’re fighting to keep this election more honest and accountable. And we can’t do it without you. In a fast-paced campaign, our supporters mean we can hold all candidates to the same three principles: get your facts right, back them up with evidence, and correct your mistakes.
Just a small monthly donation keeps us scrutinising the most harmful false claims around the clock, and challenging the people who make them.
If you, like us, don’t want your vote to be influenced by bad information, can you help out?