As the government launches its 'war on illiteracy and innumeracy' today, its own reading skills need some scrutiny.
Last month Sir Andrew Dilnot, who runs the UK Statistics Authority, rebuked the Education Secretary for claiming in Parliament that: "… under the previous Labour government one in three of our young people were leaving primary school unable to read and write."
On Friday the UK Statistics Authority published the Minister's reply:
"I disagree with your assessment that achievement below level 4 represents pupils being able to read, write and add up properly."
Sir Andrew never made any such assessment and never used the word "properly." Nor did the Minister when she repeated the one in three claim weeks after the Authority had warned her it was wrong — she said it represented pupils "unable to read and write". The Minister's reply distorts the Authority's point.
What Sir Andrew said was that the one in three includes children at level 3 at Key Stage 2 who are by definition able to "read a range of texts fluently and accurately" and write in a way which is "often organised, imaginative and clear." The description "unable to read and write" used by the Minister cannot apply to them. The Minister did however acknowledge that she forgot to include adding up in the list of things the children couldn't do.
Today it's welcome that the Minister has been careful to make the argument about what counts as proper literacy and numeracy: a debate for parents, professionals, and politicians, rather than statisticians.
But misreading the words of the UK Statistics Authority was a poor start to a literacy and numeracy drive.
The integrity of our elections is in danger, and we need your help
You’re probably here looking for facts. Thank you for that trust. But with the EU parliament elections on the way and more elections a possibility, we need to act now to make sure our elections are protected, before it’s too late.
Could you help protect our elections by becoming a Full Fact donor?
Misinformation isn’t new, but advancements in technology mean it can spread at an unprecedented scale. Our dangerously outdated election laws have not kept up with the digital age, putting our next elections at risk of abuse.
Currently, it’s possible for a candidate to run a thousand different political ads to win the same seat, promising something different to each group it targets. At the same time, there’s no law requiring those who publish online campaigns to disclose who they are or how they are funded. The opportunity for bad actors to manipulate election results is left wide open.
You may already know about our work to make public debate online more honest and transparent. Every day, we call out the most harmful misinformation on social media platforms when and where we see it. But right now, we’re urging the government to overhaul our election laws to make sure political campaigning is held to the same level of scrutiny online as it is offline.
This work all depends on the generosity of hundreds of people who all believe that for democracy to work, we need transparency. Our monthly donors help strengthen our voice, and show our politicians that this really matters. Would you consider joining them?
Become a donor today to make sure our elections are protected.