A picture shows a person installing 5G wearing a hazmat radiation suit.
The person was probably not installing 5G, but wearing protective clothing to clean a 4G mobile phone tower.
We’ve seen an image on Facebook which claims to show someone installing 5G and wearing a ‘hazmat radiation suit’ to do so.
The image doesn’t look like it was taken in the UK, as the structure in the picture looks like a monopalm, which is a type of mobile phone tower seen in the US that’s adapted to look like a palm or other common tree.
Snopes have also factchecked the image, and were told by the director of the National Association of Tower Erectors’ Wireless Industry Network, Scott Krouse, that the photo looked to him like a worker painting or cleaning the structure, possibly removing bird droppings. If you look closely, the person is holding some kind of hose.
Mr Krouse said: “Therefore, the need for a [protective suit] to prevent back-splash onto his skin and clothing.”
He added that it wasn’t a 5G tower, but looked like a “standard 4G tower based on the antennas mounted to it”.
We showed Arqiva, a communications infrastructure provider in the UK, the image, and asked them whether 5G installers have to wear radiation suits. They told us: “Anyone undertaking works on a telecoms site, including ‘installing 5G’, would not be required to wear such equipment as the site would be turned off.”
And even if it was turned on, they wouldn’t need to wear hazmat equipment.
These suits don’t protect against radiation
5G is the next generation of wireless network technology, following on from 4G. Like 4G, 3G and 2G before it, 5G mobile data is transmitted over radio waves—a small part of the whole electromagnetic spectrum (which includes microwaves, visible light and X-rays).
These radio waves are non-ionising, meaning they don’t damage the DNA inside cells, as X-rays, gamma rays and UV rays are able to do. 5G, although at slightly higher frequencies than previous networks, is still in this radio part of the electromagnetic spectrum.
Suits like the one in the image can protect wearers from biological contaminants (for example when working with people with infectious diseases) or particulates when working with chemicals, but would not protect against ionising radiation as the post suggests.
This article is part of our work factchecking potentially false pictures, videos and stories on Facebook. You can read more about this—and find out how to report Facebook content—here. For the purposes of that scheme, we’ve rated this claim as false as the person in the image isn’t installing 5G, it looks like they’re cleaning the structure, and isn’t wearing a ‘radiation suit’.
Can you help protect this election from the influence of bad information? Support Full Fact
This election, clear, accurate facts won’t always be a guarantee. False and harmful claims are spread every day by our public figures and media. Intentional or not, they have the power to shape the choices we make. We all deserve better than that.
That’s why we’re fighting to keep this election more honest and accountable. And we can’t do it without you. In a fast-paced campaign, our supporters mean we can hold all candidates to the same three principles: get your facts right, back them up with evidence, and correct your mistakes.
Just a small monthly donation keeps us scrutinising the most harmful false claims around the clock, and challenging the people who make them.
If you, like us, don’t want your vote to be influenced by bad information, can you help out?