Emmanuel Macron said the UK will only be allowed to stay in the EU if they fully adopt all EU rules and regulations including adopting the Euro within six months of stopping Brexit.
He hasn’t said this. If the UK remained in the EU we would have to continue following EU law, but not in areas where we have opt-outs. This means we wouldn’t have to join the Euro.
Emmanuel Macron said the UK must take its share of migrants, 300,000 now immediately and up to 100,000 every year until the situation is resolved if it wants to remain in the EU.
He hasn’t said this.
Emmanuel Macron said the UK must pay in full the costs involved for all other member states for Brexit, currently 39 billion euros if it wants to remain in the EU.
He hasn’t said this. Under the terms of the Brexit withdrawal agreement, we’ll pay the EU an estimated £39 billion “divorce bill” for outstanding commitments and liabilities. If we remain in the EU, we would pay our membership fee each year which would cover all these things.
Claim 1 of 3
We can find no evidence that Mr Macron has said any of these things. The claims in the post about what the UK would be forced to do if it stayed in the EU are incorrect.
The French Embassy in London confirmed to us that Mr Macron said none of these things.
“the UK will only be allowed to stay in the EU if they fully adopt all EU rules and regulations including adopting the Euro with 6 months of stopping Brexit”
We can find no evidence that Mr Macron has said anything like this.
If the UK remained in the EU we would of course have to continue following EU law. Following EU rules and regulations is a necessary part of membership of the EU and we signed up to this principle in 1972.
If we remained in the EU, we would retain all of our opt-outs. The treaty governing the UK’s opt-out of the Euro says “the United Kingdom shall not be obliged or committed to adopt the euro without a separate decision to do so by its government and parliament”.
“The UK must take its share of migrants, 300,000 now immediately and up to 100,000 every year until the situation is resolved.”
We can find no evidence that Mr Macron has said this, and it’s incorrect.
There is no demand on Britain to take 300,000 migrants if it remains in the EU. Nor is this demand made of any other EU member states.
“The UK must pay in full the costs involved for all other member states for Brexit, currently 39 billion euros.”
Again, there is no evidence Macron ever said this, and it’s incorrect.
£39 billion is the estimated cost of the “divorce bill” we would pay the EU as part of the Brexit withdrawal agreement. It covers things like payments to the EU budget until 2020, and other outstanding commitments and liabilities we have towards the EU until 2064.
If we remained in the EU, we would pay our membership fee each year which would cover all these things.
The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled on 10 December that the UK can revoke its Article 50 notification by itself, without requiring the agreement of other EU member states. This means that there is no clear mechanism by which other member states could impose new conditions, such as the ones suggested in this claim, on the UK for remaining in the EU.
This article is part of our work factchecking potentially false pictures, videos and stories on Facebook. You can read more about this—and find out how to report Facebook content—here. For the purposes of that scheme, we’ve rated this claim as FALSE.
Update 26 February 2019
We updated this article with comment from the French Embassy in London.
The integrity of our elections is in danger, and we need your help
You’re probably here looking for facts. Thank you for that trust. But with the EU parliament elections on the way and more elections a possibility, we need to act now to make sure our elections are protected, before it’s too late.
Could you help protect our elections by becoming a Full Fact donor?
Misinformation isn’t new, but advancements in technology mean it can spread at an unprecedented scale. Our dangerously outdated election laws have not kept up with the digital age, putting our next elections at risk of abuse.
Currently, it’s possible for a candidate to run a thousand different political ads to win the same seat, promising something different to each group it targets. At the same time, there’s no law requiring those who publish online campaigns to disclose who they are or how they are funded. The opportunity for bad actors to manipulate election results is left wide open.
You may already know about our work to make public debate online more honest and transparent. Every day, we call out the most harmful misinformation on social media platforms when and where we see it. But right now, we’re urging the government to overhaul our election laws to make sure political campaigning is held to the same level of scrutiny online as it is offline.
This work all depends on the generosity of hundreds of people who all believe that for democracy to work, we need transparency. Our monthly donors help strengthen our voice, and show our politicians that this really matters. Would you consider joining them?
Become a donor today to make sure our elections are protected.