Members of 38 Degrees have asked us to look into whether restrictions on their use would be affected by leaving the European Union.
Those restrictions are currently in place at EU level, so the government would have the freedom to allow more use of neonicotinoids if we were to leave. Whether it would or not is hard to say. The government opposed the EU restrictions at the time, and still says that it takes a different approach to other European countries, but ministers say they will be guided by the scientific evidence.
The EU’s role in controlling neonicotinoids
There have been three such requests by the National Farmers Union since the EU restrictions came in. The Committee supported one, over a limited area, but advised the government to reject two others, most recently in May 2016.
It advised that the application provided “insufficient information to ensure that use will be limited… [and] did not offer adequate assurance that the use will be controlled in an appropriate fashion.”
These decisions were based on whether the applications met the EU’s legal test for emergency use of unauthorised pesticides, rather than assessing their dangers.
What does the science tell us?
A major review of the evidence last year concluded that there are still “major gaps” in our understanding of how neonicotinoids affect bees, and “a limited evidence base to guide policymakers”.
Government opposition to EU restrictions on neonicotinoids
Government reviews in 2012 and 2013 argued that the studies which have been carried out test bees with unrealistically high levels of neonicotinoids, and that harmful effects would not be found in the environment. The predecessor to the Expert Committee on Pesticides agreed that a ban wasn’t justified at the time.
The government accordingly voted against the EU restrictions in 2013, saying that more evidence was needed.
If we were no longer a member of the EU, the government would no longer be covered by these restrictions.
The agriculture minister said more recently that “sometimes we have a difference of opinion with other European countries”, but stressed that “our position is that we will not remove the existing restrictions if the evidence points to the fact that those restrictions should remain”.
So there’s evidence that the government would still take a different approach to the EU, but we can’t predict what exactly it would do, as more research has been published since 2013. We’ve asked the Department for its latest take on the scientific evidence.
What’s next for neonicotinoids?
The National Farmers Union has said that it will continue to make applications to use neonicotinoids in emergency circumstances.
The EU is conducting a review of the restrictions which will conclude in 2017.
The integrity of our elections is in danger, and we need your help
You’re probably here looking for facts. Thank you for that trust. But with the EU parliament elections on the way and more elections a possibility, we need to act now to make sure our elections are protected, before it’s too late.
Could you help protect our elections by becoming a Full Fact donor?
Misinformation isn’t new, but advancements in technology mean it can spread at an unprecedented scale. Our dangerously outdated election laws have not kept up with the digital age, putting our next elections at risk of abuse.
Currently, it’s possible for a candidate to run a thousand different political ads to win the same seat, promising something different to each group it targets. At the same time, there’s no law requiring those who publish online campaigns to disclose who they are or how they are funded. The opportunity for bad actors to manipulate election results is left wide open.
You may already know about our work to make public debate online more honest and transparent. Every day, we call out the most harmful misinformation on social media platforms when and where we see it. But right now, we’re urging the government to overhaul our election laws to make sure political campaigning is held to the same level of scrutiny online as it is offline.
This work all depends on the generosity of hundreds of people who all believe that for democracy to work, we need transparency. Our monthly donors help strengthen our voice, and show our politicians that this really matters. Would you consider joining them?
Become a donor today to make sure our elections are protected.