Members of 38 Degrees have asked us to look into whether restrictions on their use would be affected by leaving the European Union.
Those restrictions are currently in place at EU level, so the government would have the freedom to allow more use of neonicotinoids if we were to leave. Whether it would or not is hard to say. The government opposed the EU restrictions at the time, and still says that it takes a different approach to other European countries, but ministers say they will be guided by the scientific evidence.
The EU’s role in controlling neonicotinoids
There have been three such requests by the National Farmers Union since the EU restrictions came in. The Committee supported one, over a limited area, but advised the government to reject two others, most recently in May 2016.
It advised that the application provided “insufficient information to ensure that use will be limited… [and] did not offer adequate assurance that the use will be controlled in an appropriate fashion.”
These decisions were based on whether the applications met the EU’s legal test for emergency use of unauthorised pesticides, rather than assessing their dangers.
What does the science tell us?
A major review of the evidence last year concluded that there are still “major gaps” in our understanding of how neonicotinoids affect bees, and “a limited evidence base to guide policymakers”.
Government opposition to EU restrictions on neonicotinoids
Government reviews in 2012 and 2013 argued that the studies which have been carried out test bees with unrealistically high levels of neonicotinoids, and that harmful effects would not be found in the environment. The predecessor to the Expert Committee on Pesticides agreed that a ban wasn’t justified at the time.
The government accordingly voted against the EU restrictions in 2013, saying that more evidence was needed.
If we were no longer a member of the EU, the government would no longer be covered by these restrictions.
The agriculture minister said more recently that “sometimes we have a difference of opinion with other European countries”, but stressed that “our position is that we will not remove the existing restrictions if the evidence points to the fact that those restrictions should remain”.
So there’s evidence that the government would still take a different approach to the EU, but we can’t predict what exactly it would do, as more research has been published since 2013. We’ve asked the Department for its latest take on the scientific evidence.
What’s next for neonicotinoids?
The National Farmers Union has said that it will continue to make applications to use neonicotinoids in emergency circumstances.
The EU is conducting a review of the restrictions which will conclude in 2017.
We need facts more than ever.
Right now, it’s difficult to know what or who to trust. Misinformation is spreading. Politics and the media are being pushed to the limit by advancements in technology and uncertainty about the future. We need facts more than ever.
This is where you come in. Your donation is vital for our small, independent team to keep going, at the time when it’s needed most. With your help, we can keep factchecking and demanding better from our politicians and public figures. We can give more people the tools to decide for themselves what to believe. We can intervene more effectively where false claims cause most harm.
Become a donor today and stand up for better public debate, on all sides, across the UK.