What does the pledge mean?
Most members of the House of Lords are appointed for life (though since 2014 they have been allowed to retire). The exceptions to this are the ‘Lords Spiritual’—the 26 Church of England archbishops and bishops entitled to sit in the House, who must retire at the age of 70.
As part of a wider commitment to reform the House of Lords, Labour’s manifesto pledged to change the rules so that: “At the end of the Parliament in which a member reaches 80 years of age, they will be required to retire from the House of Lords.”
The maximum length of a parliament is five years, which means that under these rules a peer who turned 80 just after the start of a new parliament would theoretically be able to remain in the House of Lords until they were 85 (rather than having to retire immediately upon reaching the age of 80).
Analysis by the House of Lords Library in November 2024 stated: “Assuming no changes in the current complement of life peers, including that no current life peers leave the House and no further life peers join the House, 301 (42.1%) of the House’s 715 life peers would be aged 80 or over at dissolution in 2029.” (These figures may change over the course of the parliament.)
Labour’s manifesto does not indicate when this change will take place, so we assume this pledge will be met if a retirement age is in place by the end of the current parliament.
Honesty in public debate matters
You can help us take action – and get our regular free email
What progress has been made?
It’s been reported that the government will launch a consultation on its proposal to introduce a retirement age.
As things stand, the government has yet to launch any such consultation, so for now we’ve rated this pledge as “Wait and see”.
It was reported in January 2025 that the government was considering alternative ways to reduce the size of the Lords without requiring further legislation, and was “open to ways to bring down the number of peers beyond a hard age limit of 80, if an agreement across the chamber could avoid a legislative quagmire”.
When we asked the Cabinet Office about this in March 2025 it referred us to the Labour manifesto and said that it was right that the government takes time to consider how best to implement its commitments, engaging with peers and the public where appropriate. It did not commit to a specific date for launching a consultation on the reform.