A post making a number of claims about the Lisbon Treaty and the UK’s future if it stayed in the EU has been shared several hundred times on Facebook.
“Have you read the Lisbon Treaty – If we stay in – In 2022 we become an EU state, and have to give up our currency, sovereignty, and nationality. No more Queen (or King as it may be). Also our fishing rights become owned by EU, and all gas, oil, minerals, all EU property. Financial centres all moved to Strasbourg – All agreed in the Lisbon Treaty”.
Facebook post, 11 January 2019
Most of the claims aren’t correct, and have no basis in that treaty or EU law.
The Lisbon Treaty was signed in 2007, and came into force in 2009, so things wouldn’t suddenly change if we stayed in the EU beyond 2019.
We’ve covered a longer, viral post about the Lisbon Treaty here.
The UK wouldn’t become an EU state
This post claims that if we stay in the EU, in 2022, we would become an EU state. We already are an EU state, in the sense that we are a state that’s a member of the EU. It’s unclear exactly what the post here means, but previous posts about the Lisbon Treaty have suggested the UK would become one part of a larger federal nation. There are currently no developed plans for this to happen.
As we’ve said before, becoming part of an EU state isn’t mentioned in the Lisbon Treaty, or any other EU agreements.
The treaty also doesn’t mention the year 2022.
The UK wouldn’t lose the pound
Despite several MPs claiming this, the EU isn’t forcing all countries without the euro to adopt it by a certain date.
The UK (and Denmark) have an opt-out, meaning they don’t have to join the euro area. The Lisbon Treaty does mention the ultimate goal of the “euro becoming the currency of all Member States” but that doesn’t override the UK’s opt out, and it does not set a time limit on that goal.
There are also seven other EU states (without opt-outs) that don’t have the euro either. They are expected to join when they meet certain criteria of economic stability and again there is no time limit on this.
It’s unclear what the post means by sovereignty
The post claims the UK would lose its sovereignty, i.e. the power to govern itself.
EU law also doesn’t cover all aspects of UK law. In areas where no EU law is applicable, the UK parliament and courts are the supreme bodies for making and judging law.
The UK wouldn’t lose its ‘nationality’
It’s unclear if this is a literal claim, but no country loses its nationality, or right to be an individual nation because of the Lisbon Treaty or any other EU law.
The UK wouldn’t lose its monarch
The treaty doesn’t mention any change in policy about monarchs or other heads of state.
At the moment EU member states are allowed to place limits on who can fish in their territorial waters, and up to 100 nautical miles from coasts, fishing is restricted to those who traditionally fished there, but the legislation covering this expires in 2022. Whether it will be replaced is a matter for the politicians to determine.
The Lisbon Treaty sets out that the EU has powers over “the conservation of marine biological resources” as part of the CFP and shares power with member countries over the rest of fisheries policy.
The UK’s minerals would not become “EU property”
National governments of countries in the EU have control over where companies can search for oil and gas, and grant licenses to those who want to produce it within their borders. We’ve discussed this before.
Permission to mine gold and silver is granted by the Crown Estate, while some other minerals are privately owned, and permission to mine those must be sought from the local mineral planning authority.
Financial centres aren’t moving
There is no mention in the Lisbon Treaty of moving any financial centres to Strasbourg. Strasbourg, in France, is the European Parliament’s official base, where plenary sessions (full meetings of all the MEPs) happen.
Confusion may come from the fact that the London Stock Exchange and its German equivalent had plans to merge a few years ago, but the merger was blocked by the European Commission, which said it risked creating a monopoly. This had nothing to do with the Lisbon Treaty.
This article is part of our work factchecking potentially false pictures, videos and stories on Facebook. You can read more about this—and find out how to report Facebook content—here. For the purposes of that scheme, we’ve rated this claim as false as most of the claims are wrong.
Politicians shouldn’t get away with misleading us—can you help?
As the UK’s independent factchecking charity, Full Fact relies on our supporters’ generosity to hold public figures to account and push for higher standards of debate.
But with a new prime minister on the way, and the possibility of a general election, we need your help more than ever to ensure that everyone can get the facts they need, on the issues that matter most.