No vaccine has been tested to see if it causes cancer.
In the UK, all vaccines have to undergo a number of trials, usually over a period of years, to check if they cause any side effects.
Vaccines contain ingredients known to cause cancer.
No vaccines given in the UK contain enough of any chemical to be carcinogenic.
Claim 1 of 2
All vaccines have to undergo a series of trial phases, which last years, to check whether they cause any side effects. And no vaccines given in the UK contain enough of any chemical to be carcinogenic.
There have been studies looking into whether cancer is associated with being vaccinated. One study looked at whether vaccines (amongst other factors like, breastfeeding and certain medication) were associated with childhood leukaemia in Canada. (Looking at whether a disease is associated with something is about seeing if the two are likely to occur together, not whether one causes the other.) That study didn’t find any association between common vaccines and leukaemia. Other studies have had similar results with vaccinations in general.
But the implication of this claim is that new vaccines aren’t tested to see if they cause negative side effects like cancer. That’s certainly not the case. In the UK, vaccines go through a lot of testing before they’re approved. The Vaccine Knowledge Project at the University of Oxford says this is partly because vaccines are one of the few medical treatments given to healthy people, so there’s a lower level of risk tolerated than treatments for say, cancer.
These steps include laboratory testing, where the vaccine is tested with cells and in living things (usually mice). Then there are three phases of trials in people, the first with a group of adults, the second with a few hundred people, and the third with a few thousand. These trials monitor for all types of side effects, both life-threatening and not. If all goes well, the government’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (or the European equivalent) reviews all of the data collected and decides whether the vaccine works and is safe.
This process takes years. It took almost 20 years for the Meningitis B vaccine to go from first concept to being licensed.
Monitoring the vaccine’s safety doesn’t stop when the vaccine gets licensed for use. There is then a fourth phase of studying the vaccine which looks at its effect in the wider population, which is called “post-marketing surveillance”.
It’s important to remember that a percentage of the population will get cancer eventually, so a certain number of people in each trial group eventually getting cancer doesn’t mean the vaccine caused it. If more than that baseline proportion develop cancer (and other factors, like whether they smoke, haven’t been accounted for) that would be cause for concern.
So although when vaccines are first trialled, there aren’t specific studies looking solely at whether they can cause cancer—there are multiple trials looking out for any negative side effects.
Vaccines in the UK don’t contain any chemicals in levels high enough to cause cancer
It’s sometimes claimed online that there are carcinogenic substances in vaccines.
As we’ve discussed before, there are chemicals that do have the potential to cause cancer in some vaccines, but not in high enough levels to be carcinogenic.
Take formaldehyde for example, which at certain concentrations is probably carcinogenic but is also naturally present in the human body. It may be present in trace amounts in the Hepatitis B vaccine, as it’s used in production to kill the virus. But it’s certainly not in high enough concentrations in the vaccine to be carcinogenic to humans. The Vaccine Knowledge Project says that the amount of natural formaldehyde in a two month-old’s blood is around ten times greater than the amount found in any vaccine.
This claim may have stemmed from the fact that a proportion of doses of a polio vaccine used in the 1950s and 1960s were contaminated with a virus that is found in some human tumours and can cause cancer in rodents. But multiple studies have not found adequate evidence that having that vaccine increased someone’s chance of getting cancer.
This article is part of our work factchecking potentially false pictures, videos and stories on Facebook. You can read more about this—and find out how to report Facebook content—here. For the purposes of that scheme, we’ve rated this claim as false because there are trials to check new vaccines don’t have harmful side effects like cancer.
Can you help protect this election from the influence of bad information? Support Full Fact
This election, clear, accurate facts won’t always be a guarantee. False and harmful claims are spread every day by our public figures and media. Intentional or not, they have the power to shape the choices we make. We all deserve better than that.
That’s why we’re fighting to keep this election more honest and accountable. And we can’t do it without you. In a fast-paced campaign, our supporters mean we can hold all candidates to the same three principles: get your facts right, back them up with evidence, and correct your mistakes.
Just a small monthly donation keeps us scrutinising the most harmful false claims around the clock, and challenging the people who make them.
If you, like us, don’t want your vote to be influenced by bad information, can you help out?