It was a plan "too preposterous for words" according to the Belfast Telegraph, but that didn't stop a number of outlets reporting seriously on the government's proposal to relocate the population of Hong Kong to Northern Ireland.
The Express, for example, stated that "the scheme failed to impress the Foreign Office". The New York Times noted that when George Fergusson, an official in the Northern Ireland Office, came up with the "bizarre plan" it was not entirely clear whether or not he was writing "tongue-in-cheek".
Most outlets recognised that the replies to his memo took it as a joke, but painted a picture of an initial thought that might—or might not—have been serious.
The whole business was far too entertaining for us to pass over. We got in touch with the National Archives in Kew and requested a copy of the exchanges. Scanned copies have now arrived, in all their high-definition glory.
So was the Northern Ireland Office seriously recommending relocating the populace of Hong Kong to Ulster—more specifically, sunny Magilligan?
Absolutely not. The ancient art of spotting a joke without the aid of emojiis may be somewhat lost, and to be fair the humour of the Fergusson memo is very dry.
But there are hints. For instance, the word "spoof" written on the top right hand corner of the first page.
And while most of the text reads very seriously, the passage wondering whether the land set aside for settlement would need to be Hong Kong-shaped is a bit of a giveaway.
If you're interested in reading the full exchange, you can find it here.
If you're interesting in envisaging how this might have worked in practice, you can find the relevant scene from Father Ted here.
The integrity of our elections is in danger, and we need your help
You’re probably here looking for facts. Thank you for that trust. But with the EU parliament elections on the way and more elections a possibility, we need to act now to make sure our elections are protected, before it’s too late.
Could you help protect our elections by becoming a Full Fact donor?
Misinformation isn’t new, but advancements in technology mean it can spread at an unprecedented scale. Our dangerously outdated election laws have not kept up with the digital age, putting our next elections at risk of abuse.
Currently, it’s possible for a candidate to run a thousand different political ads to win the same seat, promising something different to each group it targets. At the same time, there’s no law requiring those who publish online campaigns to disclose who they are or how they are funded. The opportunity for bad actors to manipulate election results is left wide open.
You may already know about our work to make public debate online more honest and transparent. Every day, we call out the most harmful misinformation on social media platforms when and where we see it. But right now, we’re urging the government to overhaul our election laws to make sure political campaigning is held to the same level of scrutiny online as it is offline.
This work all depends on the generosity of hundreds of people who all believe that for democracy to work, we need transparency. Our monthly donors help strengthen our voice, and show our politicians that this really matters. Would you consider joining them?
Become a donor today to make sure our elections are protected.